forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: Vadim Torchinov <torchinov@yahoo.com>
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] GW calculations...
- Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2002 02:41:53 -0700 (PDT)
Dear Gian-Marco,
thank you very much for last message. It was really helpful.
One more question: why does the presence of non-symmorphic operations
in the symmetries list cause problems? Does it cause wrong
wavefunctions in _STA (or _KSS) file to be produced?
Best wishes,
Vadim.
--- Gian-Marco Rignanese <rignanese@pcpm.ucl.ac.be> wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> Some of you have recently reported a problem with the GW calculations
> in ABINIT. We have tracked the origin of this problem to the presence
> of non-symmorphic operations in the symmetries list after suppressing
> those related through the inversion symmetry. The possibility to deal
> with this kind of operations is not yet included in the GW part of
> ABINIT (we hope that it will be in a "near" future).
>
> So far, the program would just give a WARNING ("The GW program may
> give incorrect results"). Starting from ABINITv3.4.3, we have decided
> to replace this WARNING by an ERROR. Therefore, the program will not
> produce the _KSS file when non-symmorphic operations in the
symmetries
> list after suppressing those related through the inversion symmetry.
>
> What should be done to go further in such situations?
>
> 1) In some simple cases, it is possible to choose the atomic
positions
> in such a way to get rid of the problem. For instance, in the case of
>
> Silicon (2 atoms unit cell), one can choose either:
> xred 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.250 0.250 0.250
> or:
> xred -0.125 -0.125 -0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125
>
> In the first case, the GW calculation works perfectly; while in the
> second one, the rotations (without inversion) are non-symmorphic.
>
> 2) In the other cases, the symmetries list should be checked in
> details. All the symmetries that are related through the inversion
are
> now (from ABINIT v3.4.3 on) indicated explicitly in the log file. The
> remaining operations that are non-symmorphic can thus be found
> easily.
> Finally, the calculation should be restarted with the list of
> symmetries that should be taken into account explicitly indicated in
> the input file (use nsym, symrel and tnons).
>
> Best regards,
>
> Gian-Marco.
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes
http://finance.yahoo.com
- GW calculations..., Gian-Marco Rignanese, 09/07/2002
- Re: [abinit-forum] GW calculations..., Vadim Torchinov, 09/07/2002
- Re: [abinit-forum] GW calculations..., Gian-Marco Rignanese, 09/07/2002
- Re: GW calculations... Vadim's questions, Valerio Olevano, 09/09/2002
- Re: [abinit-forum] GW calculations..., Vadim Torchinov, 09/07/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.