forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: Valerio Olevano <valerio.olevano@polytechnique.fr>
- To: forum@abinit.org, g930102@ccit.edu.tw, Gian-Marco Rignanese <rignanese@pcpm.ucl.ac.be>
- Subject: Re: The GW code is only valid for FCC lattice now?
- Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 15:15:57 +0200
You didn't read my e-mail carefully.
yes it's true that the GW code now in that part has a specialization
for fcc (as well as in other parts not relevant like in the print of the
side a of the fcc cell somewhere that however is used nowhere).
But the error introduced it's small and as long as you increase your
mesh of k-points tends to 0.
That point (ndb the point for rho_twiddle*rhotwiddle / q^2 for q->0 and G,G' = 0, n=n1 k=k1)
is treated like in Phillips Kleinman Phys Rev. 128, 2098 (1962),
or if you want a more recent paper,
like in Hybertsen Louie, PRB 34, 5390 (1986).
Essentially you should calculate
1/eta \int_\eta d^3 q 1/q^2
where eta is the volume of the Brillouin zone divided by the number of k-points N_k.
If you suppose that your BZ (already a good approximation) is a sphere, then the result
you get is
7.79 \eta^(-2/3)
For the structure of the code, then at that point you should put
rhotwg(1) = the sqrt (of the previous result) times qpg(1)
(later re-stripped by a division by qpg(1)).
In the case of fcc the constant is 7.44
in the case of wurtzite I don't know or even if I know
I certainly don't remember.
Best regards.
Valerio Olevano
- The GW code is only valid for FCC lattice now?, g930102, 09/12/2002
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: The GW code is only valid for FCC lattice now?, Valerio Olevano, 09/12/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.