Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

forum - Re: [abinit-forum] Using ABINIT to find effective masses of electrons and holes of semiconductors

forum@abinit.org

Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )

List archive

Re: [abinit-forum] Using ABINIT to find effective masses of electrons and holes of semiconductors


Chronological Thread 
  • From:   <mz24cn@hotmail.com>
  • To: forum@abinit.org
  • Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] Using ABINIT to find effective masses of electrons and holes of semiconductors
  • Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 17:57:09 +0800

Dear Fiorentini,
Yes, just as what you said, I had noticed that a second order polynomial may lead to unstable results sometimes. In fact, from the theoretical point of view, second order polynomial is always true to extract the effective masses when delta k vector in BZ is so small that higher order components of the polynomial can be omitted. But as I had described in last letter, 'the ABINIT-output eigenvalues is fixed to the format of five-digit decimal fraction', when delta k is too small so that you can only acquire the 'identical' eigenvalues for different k vectors. So, as for ABINIT package, kptbounds should be carefully choosed. And use unit eV instead of unit hatree to get as possible as many effective digits. I found delta k=0.02 for ndivk=40 is enough to get ideal results for silicon. For other materials, you should carefully try kptbounds and ndivk value OR, use higher order polynomial.

Good continuation,
Mike

From: Vincenzo Fiorentini <vincenzo.fiorentini@dsf.unica.it>
Reply-To: forum@abinit.org
To: forum@abinit.org
Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] Using ABINIT to find effective masses of
electrons and holes of semiconductors &
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2002 17:39:03 +0200

dr.horsfield@physics.org wrote:



For my thesis (many years ago) I did something similar with the Corning
Code (Abinit's precursor). I found the results were sensitive to the
fitting polynomial. Have you tried anything other than a quadratic?



(about effective masses) I would agree a second order polynomial may be poor in some instances. I did something too a while ago (PRB 46, 2086 (92)) with a fourth order polynomial and it seemed fairly stable.

best - Vincenzo
--

Prof. Dr. Vincenzo Fiorentini

vincenzo.fiorentini@dsf.unica.it
INFM - Dipartimento di Fisica
Universita' di Cagliari
Cittadella Universitaria
S.P. Monserrato-Sestu Km 0.700
I-09042 Monserrato (CA), Italy
tel +39 070 6754912
fax +39 070 510171








_________________________________________________________________
与联机的朋友进行交流,请使用 MSN Messenger: http://messenger.microsoft.com/cn/




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page