Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

forum - Re: [abinit-forum] the Symmetry-preserving and the Convergance of Relaxation Calculations

forum@abinit.org

Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )

List archive

Re: [abinit-forum] the Symmetry-preserving and the Convergance of Relaxation Calculations


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Thierry Deutsch <tdeutsch@cea.fr>
  • To: forum@abinit.org
  • Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] the Symmetry-preserving and the Convergance of Relaxation Calculations
  • Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 11:10:45 +0100
  • Organization: CEA-Grenoble - DRFMC

Mike, Matthieu,

I give some comments from my "numerical experience".

The convergence of surface relaxations is a difficult problem.
Even with Si, it is sometimes difficult to have a good convergence (defects,
surfaces).
I have tried to calculate some systems with ABINIT and CPMD.
Some systems do not converge with ABINIT and did with CPMD.
But the inverse is also true. So I dont give up hope to have a "perfect"
program ;-).

CPMD has both schemes:
- diagonalisation+mixing as ABINIT which is the only method possible if there
is no gap.
- direct minimisation of energy (which you call CP).

The last scheme is faster for semiconductor or insulator. Nevertheless, there
are also some problems of convergence. I think it is easier to have a robust
method to converge (DIIS+some controls) because the scheme is more simple.

So the solution is ti tune by hand, except if you want to discover and
implement an efficient scheme.





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page