forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
Re: [abinit-forum] the Symmetry-preserving and the Convergance of Relaxation Calculations
Chronological Thread
- From: Thierry Deutsch <tdeutsch@cea.fr>
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] the Symmetry-preserving and the Convergance of Relaxation Calculations
- Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 11:10:45 +0100
- Organization: CEA-Grenoble - DRFMC
Mike, Matthieu,
I give some comments from my "numerical experience".
The convergence of surface relaxations is a difficult problem.
Even with Si, it is sometimes difficult to have a good convergence (defects,
surfaces).
I have tried to calculate some systems with ABINIT and CPMD.
Some systems do not converge with ABINIT and did with CPMD.
But the inverse is also true. So I dont give up hope to have a "perfect"
program ;-).
CPMD has both schemes:
- diagonalisation+mixing as ABINIT which is the only method possible if there
is no gap.
- direct minimisation of energy (which you call CP).
The last scheme is faster for semiconductor or insulator. Nevertheless, there
are also some problems of convergence. I think it is easier to have a robust
method to converge (DIIS+some controls) because the scheme is more simple.
So the solution is ti tune by hand, except if you want to discover and
implement an efficient scheme.
- the Symmetry-preserving and the Convergance of Relaxation Calculations, Zhang Mike, 02/12/2003
- Re: [abinit-forum] the Symmetry-preserving and the Convergance of Relaxation Calculations, verstraete, 02/12/2003
- Re: [abinit-forum] the Symmetry-preserving and the Convergance of Relaxation Calculations, Thierry Deutsch, 02/12/2003
- Re: [abinit-forum] the Symmetry-preserving and the Convergance of Relaxation Calculations, verstraete, 02/12/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.