Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

forum - Re: [abinit-forum] DOS and parameters

forum@abinit.org

Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )

List archive

Re: [abinit-forum] DOS and parameters


Chronological Thread 
  • From: verstraete@pcpm.ucl.ac.be
  • To: forum@abinit.org
  • Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] DOS and parameters
  • Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 16:13:38 +0200 (CEST)

Hello,

Firstly, your tsmear is quite high. It might not influence the energy too
much, but unless you're using cold smearing it probably deforms the forces.

To get a good dos, 2 possibilities:
1) use a lot of kpoints. For a metallic system at least a 10x10x10 grid.
For prtdos 1 use a lower tsmear or the whole DOS will be smeared out of
visibility. I think this is your main problem. If you want a clean DOS, do
a first calculation with whatever smearing you want, then redo a single
SCF step with occopt 7 and a small tsmear (~0.001 to 0.01) to insure the
full detail of the DOS can be seen.

2) use the tetrahedron method prtdos 2 (much better and uses fewer
kpoints). However, I recommend a non-shifted and even numbered grid of
kpoints; this insures you'll hit on the special points in most systems.
Take care: if your system doesn't have inversion symmetry, there is still
a bug in 4.1.2 (use prtdos 1). The fix has been found by Michel Cote, but
isn't implemented yet.

Matthieu

On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, Dominik Legut wrote:

> Dear Abinit users,
>
> I have a general question concerning DOS.
>
> I have converged the total energy in my calculation to the precision
> of 3E-06 Ha per atom with respect to the number of k-points (40), cutoff
> (30 Ha) and tsmear parameter (0.05).
>
> If I would like to get precise DOS, how much do I need to change
> the parameters mentioned above ?
>
> I plotted the DOS (with parameters indicated above) and compared it to the
> FLAPW
> calculation; I found considerable discrepancies between those two.
>
> I also increased the number of KP to be the same in both calculations
> (ABINIT and FLAPW cases) and compared both DOSs again, but they do not
> change too much (almost not at all) - there are still large differences
> between the FLAPW and ABINIT results.
>
> Can anyone comment on this?
> Thank you in advance.
>
> Dominik Legut.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Dominik Legut tel.+420/5/32290461
> Institute of Physics of Materials fax.+420/5/41218657
> Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic email: legut@ipm.cz
> Zizkova 22, Brno
> CZ-616 62
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>

--
===================================================================
Matthieu Verstraete mailto:verstraete@pcpm.ucl.ac.be
PCPM, Boltzmann, pl. Croix du Sud, 1 tel: 010/ 47 86 81
B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve Belgium fax: 010/ 47 34 52



  • DOS and parameters, Dominik Legut, 06/12/2003
    • Re: [abinit-forum] DOS and parameters, verstraete, 06/12/2003

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page