Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

forum - RE: [abinit-forum] wavefunction normalization

forum@abinit.org

Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )

List archive

RE: [abinit-forum] wavefunction normalization


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Allan, Douglas C Dr" <AllanDC@Corning.com>
  • To: "'forum@abinit.org'" <forum@abinit.org>
  • Subject: RE: [abinit-forum] wavefunction normalization
  • Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 07:40:57 -0400

Unless the convention has changed, the complex wavefunction coefficients CG
should be normalized to 1.0 separately for each band. There should not be
any factor of unit cell volume or spin degeneracy in the wavefunction
coefficients themselves -- such factors are applied later where needed. For
example, to produce an electron density you would need spin degeneracy and
unit cell volume. I can only guess that the simple sum was not performed
correctly or was not reading the CG values correctly.
Doug Allan

-----Original Message-----
From: Kristopher Andersen [mailto:andersen@yclept.ucdavis.edu]
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 7:26 PM
To: ABINIT Forum
Subject: [abinit-forum] wavefunction normalization


I was doing some simple tests of the wavefunction, as read from _WFK, and
found that the wavefunction doesn't appear to be normalized? For example, a
simple sum of abs(cg)**2 gives 0.5 instead of 1.0? (Where cg are the
coefficients in the planewave expansion of the
wavefunction.) Also, the values seem to fluctuate quite a bit per band. I saw
numbers between 0.4 and 0.8. Shouldn't the normalization be essentially
identical between bands? Does anybody know what's happening here? From what I
can tell, the wavefunction coefficients, as read from _WFK, need to be
multiplied by a factor of sqrt(2.0 / V), where V is the volume of the unit
cell. Is this correct?

--
Kristopher Andersen http://yclept.ucdavis.edu/~andersen
Department of Physics andersen@physics.ucdavis.edu
University of California at Davis +1 (530) 752-0446



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page