Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

forum - Re: Re: [abinit-forum] Definition of hexagonal cell / MgZn2

forum@abinit.org

Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )

List archive

Re: Re: [abinit-forum] Definition of hexagonal cell / MgZn2


Chronological Thread 
  • From: c.gross@physik.uni-frankfurt.de
  • To: forum@abinit.org
  • Subject: Re: Re: [abinit-forum] Definition of hexagonal cell / MgZn2
  • Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 13:09:22 +0200

Dear Lu Fu-Fa,
dear everybody,

Thanks for your reply - this was a step forward, as your input file at least
works without producing warnings, if I replace the keyword 'ntype' (old ?) by
'ntypat'.

However, I am still not really satisfied, as I do not understand whether this
is the complete solution to my problem. The point is: In your input file, you
have chosen to list 6 atoms, which is somewhere between the number of atoms
in the asymmetric unit (3) and the total number of atoms in the unit cell
(12). From these 6 positions, ABINIS figures out the spacegroup (#194)
correctly (without the space group being explicitly specified by the keyword
'spgroup'), but is the following calculation (of etot, for example) based on
all 12 atoms, or just these 6 ? Why and how did you choose these 6 positions ?

I am not convinced that this the way the authors of ABINIS (hello, someone
following this thread ? Please help...) actually had in mind. What, if I want
to do a geometric optimisation of individual atoms afterwards ? Only 3 of
these 6 positions are not related by symmetry, as enforced by the choice of
the space group.

I would be thankful, if someone could sent me a working example with keyword
'spgroup' of some known structure (does not have to be MgZn2, :-). Even
better: Can someone please comment on the central question: If I specify the
space group by keyword 'spgroup', do I have to specify more atomic position
than just the asymmetric unit ?

Best regards,
Christoph

PS: Thanks to Lu Fu-Fa for the nice 'Navy link' !



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page