Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

forum - Re: [abinit-forum] Convergance problem

forum@abinit.org

Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )

List archive

Re: [abinit-forum] Convergance problem


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "lvying" <lvying@ctb.pku.edu.cn>
  • To: <forum@abinit.org>
  • Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] Convergance problem
  • Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 17:43:25 +0800

Title: Re: [abinit-forum] Convergance problem
Hi:
    Thanks for your advice.
    Is that possible to deal with charged defect in ABINIT?  what input parameters should be modified?
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2003 1:04 AM
Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] Convergance problem



Hi,


We worked on defects in ZnO a while ago.  Sometimes electronic
convergence in oxides becomes more difficult as you take
electrons from the filled oxygen states (which is what happens
when Zn is removed).  In some cases it may be more relevant to work
with charged defects.  You can find some approach in our paper
on this material A.F. Kohan, G. Ceder, D. Morgan and C. Van de Walle, First-Principles Study of Native Point Defects in ZnO, Physical Review B, 61(22), 15019-27 (2000).  Other approaches can be used as well.

Good luck.

Gerd Ceder



Dear Users:
    I am dealing with defect study of ZnO, using super cell methord of 32 atoms.  However, As one Zn is removed, I can't perform ground-state calculation due to the great oscillation of total energy (about 1d+01 H). the problem might be reduce to the unreleased geometry of the supercell, but if iI can't do ground-state calculation, how could I perform geometry optimization?  
    Anyone who has experience in similiar problem, please help.
thanks




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page