Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

forum - RE: [abinit-forum] phonons of hexagonal systems: probable bug

forum@abinit.org

Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )

List archive

RE: [abinit-forum] phonons of hexagonal systems: probable bug


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Artem R. Oganov" <a.oganov@mat.ethz.ch>
  • To: <forum@abinit.org>
  • Subject: RE: [abinit-forum] phonons of hexagonal systems: probable bug
  • Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 16:12:11 +0200
  • Importance: Normal
  • Organization: ETH Zurich

Hi Jorge,

Try any system (or even look at the tutorial) - you will see small
departures from exact degeneracies. I guess (didn't check) that these
departures would increase as your calculation gets cruder (or Ecut gets
lower).

Now, the acoustic frequencies you get at Gamma are SO large that there
is obviously something very wrong in the calculation. Which
pseudopotentials do you use? For some types (e.g., HGH) the needed Ecut
is very high (easily above 100-200 Ha). Though from the small changes in
your results I suppose your calculation is likely converged...

Some people have studied hexagonal materials with ABINIT, and did not
seem to get in any troubles - e.g., Xavier studied quartz and got
perfectly reasonable results. All I can suggest is a problem with your
input file.

Artem
************************
Dr. Artem R. Oganov
Lab. of Crystallography
Department of Materials
ETH Zurich
CH-8092 Zurich
Switzerland
Tel.: +41-1-632-3752; Fax: +41-1-632-1133
E-mail: a.oganov@mat.ethz.ch
Website: http://olivine.ethz.ch/~artem
************************


-----Original Message-----
From: Jorge Iniguez [mailto: ]
Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 3:49 PM
To: forum@abinit.org
Subject: RE: [abinit-forum] phonons of hexagonal systems: probable bug

Hi Artem,

Thanks for your suggestion! I increased the cutoff from 1000 eV to 1500
eV, which should be enough to see some improvement. The 1000 eV results
were:

Phonon wavevector (reduced coordinates) : 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
Phonon energies in Hartree :
8.954702E-04 1.138484E-03 1.197535E-03 2.116134E-03 3.353738E-03
3.641500E-03 4.411735E-03 4.837036E-03 5.507493E-03
Phonon frequencies in cm-1 :
- 1.965330E+02 2.498684E+02 2.628285E+02 4.644378E+02 7.360604E+02
- 7.992168E+02 9.682638E+02 1.061607E+03 1.208755E+03

and the 1500 eV results are:

Phonon wavevector (reduced coordinates) : 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
Phonon energies in Hartree :
8.957446E-04 1.138428E-03 1.197495E-03 2.116817E-03 3.353848E-03
3.643423E-03 4.411971E-03 4.837699E-03 5.506935E-03
Phonon frequencies in cm-1 :
- 1.965932E+02 2.498561E+02 2.628197E+02 4.645877E+02 7.360846E+02
- 7.996390E+02 9.683157E+02 1.061752E+03 1.208633E+03

As you see, things have not changed much, not even for the acoustic
modes.

But note something important: It would have been a surprise that the
lack
of degeneracies had to do with the cutoff. I ask abinit to calculate
the
phonons by constructing the dynamical matrix out of an irreducible set
of
symmetry independent perturbations. Hence, the symmetries should be
exact
by construction, no matter what cutoff I use.

Actually, the above test indicates this probable bug (in the
construction
of the dynamical matrix from the minimal set of RF calculations) may be
responsible for the nonzero acoustic modes too, since increasing the
cutoff does not seem to help.

Cheers,
Jorge


On Fri, 8 Aug 2003, Artem R. Oganov wrote:

> Dear Jorge,
>
> It seems to me that you are using a too small Ecut. Have you tried to
> increase it and see what happens? This would probably give you
> nearly-zero acoustic frequencies, but also could resolve your problem:
> ABINIT always gives some small deviations from the exact degeneracy
> (consider this as a numerical error), and I would expect these
> deviations to become smaller as you increase Ecut - in other words, in
a
> crude calculation the degeneracy may be hidden by the errors due to a
> small number of plane waves. If you try your calculation with a bigger
> Ecut - please let me know what you see.
>
> With my best regards,
>
> Artem
> ************************
> Dr. Artem R. Oganov
> Lab. of Crystallography
> Department of Materials
> ETH Zurich
> CH-8092 Zurich
> Switzerland
> Tel.: +41-1-632-3752; Fax: +41-1-632-1133
> E-mail: a.oganov@mat.ethz.ch
> Website: http://olivine.ethz.ch/~artem
> ************************
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jorge Iniguez [mailto:jiniguez@nist.gov]
> Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 7:35 PM
> To: forum@abinit.org
> Subject: [abinit-forum] phonons of hexagonal systems: probable bug
>
> Dear abinitioners,
>
> We have found what seems to be bug in the calculation of phonons of
> hexagonal systems. Input and output files go attached.
>
> We have studied MgB2, which has 3 atoms per unit cell and space group
> P6_3/mmm. At the Gamma point, this system should have four different
> optical phonon frequencies, two of them being doubly degenerate. When
> we
> try to calculate them, abinit correctly recognizes four (as opposed to
> nine) irreducible perturbations:
>
> The list of irreducible perturbations for this q vector is:
> 1) idir= 1 ipert= 1
> 2) idir= 3 ipert= 1
> 3) idir= 1 ipert= 2
> 4) idir= 3 ipert= 2
>
> However, the final result is a list of frequencies...
>
> Phonon wavevector (reduced coordinates) : 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
> Phonon energies in Hartree :
> 8.954702E-04 1.138484E-03 1.197535E-03 2.116134E-03
3.353738E-03
> 3.641500E-03 4.411735E-03 4.837036E-03 5.507493E-03
> Phonon frequencies in cm-1 :
> - 1.965330E+02 2.498684E+02 2.628285E+02 4.644378E+02
7.360604E+02
> - 7.992168E+02 9.682638E+02 1.061607E+03 1.208755E+03
>
> .... that does not show the expected degeneracies!! I could only
briefly
> look for the bug, but did not succeed, so I turn to the experts out
> there :)
>
> Cheers,
> Jorge
>
> PS: I guess that the nonzero acoustic frequencies are to be attributed
> to
> the problem described in the FAQ...
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ------
> Jorge Iniguez NIST Center for Neutron Research
> 100 Bureau Drive, Mail Stop 8562
> Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8562
> Phone: 1-301-975-8367 Fax: 1-301-921-9847
> E-mail address: jiniguez@nist.gov
> http://www.ncnr.nist.gov/staff/jorge
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ------
>
>
>




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page