Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

forum - Re: [abinit-forum] acoustic phonons for metals

forum@abinit.org

Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )

List archive

Re: [abinit-forum] acoustic phonons for metals


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Jorge Iniguez <jiniguez@nist.gov>
  • To: forum@abinit.org
  • Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] acoustic phonons for metals
  • Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2003 09:51:30 -0400


Thank you all for your responses! OK, so the problem is very probably
related to the XC-FFT loss of translational symmetry, which may be worse
for alkali atoms, and things would improve if we could use intxc=1 in the
response calculations (and things *will* improve if I compute the gamma
phonons via ground state calculations with intxc=1; I will check). I
guess I could have imagined... I was misled by the fact that the
insulating case worked so well, but Matthieu's proposed explanation for
this is probably right. (By the way, Matthieu, I am using TM pseudos from
the Khein-Allan distribution, so the calculations should be converged in
the cutoff.) OK then, I will keep playing with these things and let you
know if I find something noteworthy.

Cheers,
Jorge




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page