forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: mmikami@rc.m-kagaku.co.jp
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] Problem about Fddd Please help us
- Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 10:10:23 +0900
Hello, ("Na-ma-steh")
Although I noticed that the option "spgorig 2" was missing
in the original input (and no chkprim needed), it did not solve the problem.
(For the detail of "spgorig" and the other spg* options, kindly see
http://www.abinit.org/ABINIT/Infos_v4.1/vargeo.htm#spgorig
http://www.abinit.org/ABINIT/Infos_v4.1/spacegrouphelpfile.htm
and the links therein (specifically, "content"),
http://www.abinit.org/ABINIT/Infos_v4.1/spgrdescription.htm )
WhenI added "spgorig 2", I got the message :
-----
operat : ERROR -
The number of atoms obtained from symmetries, 76
is greater than the input number of atoms, natom= 56
This is not allowed.
Action : modify natom or the symmetry data in the input file.
-----
What is going on ?!
Although the problem is not solved (less time to look into now...),
how about the assignment of all the atoms (without spg*, natrd, brvlatt ....) ?
Just for check of the geometry, could you see
if the xred data given below is all right for the Na2SO4 ?
I just made a full internal coordinates of the atoms therein
with a graphic interface ("Cerius2").
(NB: This "xred" would need one more option " chkprim 0",
so the primitive cell should be smaller ...)
If I would misunderstand anything, I would appreciate the corrections.
Regards,
Masayoshi
----- (Na2SO4 internal coordinates) -----
typat 16*1 8*2 32*3 # 16 Na, 8 S, 32 O
xred
0.12500 0.12500 0.44000
0.62500 0.62500 0.44000
0.62500 0.12500 0.31000
0.12500 0.62500 0.31000
0.87500 0.87500 0.56000
0.37500 0.37500 0.56000
0.37500 0.87500 0.69000
0.87500 0.37500 0.69000
0.12500 0.62500 0.94000
0.62500 0.12500 0.94000
0.62500 0.62500 0.81000
0.12500 0.12500 0.81000
0.87500 0.37500 0.06000
0.37500 0.87500 0.06000
0.37500 0.37500 0.19000
0.87500 0.87500 0.19000
0.12500 0.12500 0.12500
0.62500 0.62500 0.12500
0.62500 0.12500 0.62500
0.12500 0.62500 0.62500
0.87500 0.87500 0.87500
0.37500 0.37500 0.87500
0.37500 0.87500 0.37500
0.87500 0.37500 0.37500
0.98100 0.05700 0.20000
0.76900 0.69300 0.20000
0.76900 0.05700 0.55000
0.98100 0.69300 0.55000
0.01900 0.94300 0.80000
0.23100 0.30700 0.80000
0.23100 0.94300 0.45000
0.01900 0.30700 0.45000
0.98100 0.55700 0.70000
0.76900 0.19300 0.70000
0.76900 0.55700 0.05000
0.98100 0.19300 0.05000
0.01900 0.44300 0.30000
0.23100 0.80700 0.30000
0.23100 0.44300 0.95000
0.01900 0.80700 0.95000
0.48100 0.05700 0.70000
0.26900 0.69300 0.70000
0.26900 0.05700 0.05000
0.48100 0.69300 0.05000
0.51900 0.94300 0.30000
0.73100 0.30700 0.30000
0.73100 0.94300 0.95000
0.51900 0.30700 0.95000
0.48100 0.55700 0.20000
0.26900 0.19300 0.20000
0.26900 0.55700 0.55000
0.48100 0.19300 0.55000
0.51900 0.44300 0.80000
0.73100 0.80700 0.80000
0.73100 0.44300 0.45000
0.51900 0.80700 0.45000
----- (end of Na2SO4 internal coordinates) -----
On 2003.10.22, at 16:51 Asia/Tokyo, devidas@met.iitb.ac.in wrote:
Dear friends
We are new user of ABINIT.
To acquaint with code we are trying few well reported systems, we are facing one problem with Na2SO4(Fddd)
There are 8 formula units of Na2SO4 in Fddd and total 56 atoms.
fractional coordinates and site are as follows reported by Nord et al)
Na2SO4
Space group Fddd(70)origin choice-2
S (8a) 1/8, 1/8, 1/8
Na (16g)1/8 , 1/8 , z=0.44
O 32(h) x=-0.019,y=0.057,z=0.2
But it lead to error in log file that, there are 96 atoms in unit cell, and stops there.
The input file is as follows
----------------------------------------------------------------------- -
natom 56
natrd 3
ntypat 3
typat 1 2 3
brvlatt 3
acell 11.07 23.24 18.55
angdeg 90 90 90
chkprim 0
znucl 11 16 8
xred
1/8 1/8 0.44
1/8 1/8 1/8
-0.019 0.057 0.2
ecut 20
spgroup 70
toldfe 1.0d-6
dimac 1.0
diemix 0.5
----------------------------------------------------------------------- ------
Actual number of atom in unit cell is 56, but prog. is calculating 96 atoms(mostly by considering the 32h site for all atoms even if Na and S are on special position.) but we could not workout this problem.
Please help us to workout this error.
with regards
Santosh & Devidas
- Problem about Fddd Please help us, devidas, 10/22/2003
- Re: [abinit-forum] Problem about Fddd Please help us, mmikami, 10/24/2003
- Re: [abinit-forum] Problem about Fddd Please help us, Masatake Takahashi, 10/27/2003
- Re: [abinit-forum] Problem about Fddd Please help us, mmikami, 10/27/2003
- Re: [abinit-forum] Problem about Fddd Please help us, Masatake Takahashi, 10/27/2003
- Re: [abinit-forum] Problem about Fddd Please help us, mmikami, 10/27/2003
- Re: [abinit-forum] Problem about Fddd Please help us, Masatake Takahashi, 10/27/2003
- RE: [abinit-forum] Problem about Fddd Please help us, Miguel Angel Salvado Sanchez, 10/27/2003
- Re: [abinit-forum] Problem about Fddd Please help us, mmikami, 10/24/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.