Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

forum - Doubt Reposted

forum@abinit.org

Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )

List archive

Doubt Reposted


Chronological Thread 
  • From: santosh_bobade@yahoo.com
  • To: forum@abinit.org
  • Subject: Doubt Reposted
  • Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 10:49:40 +0100

Dear Abinit user

I am trying to know more about code so that it can be really
exploited for. while doing this I am trying to run some response function
calculation for BaTiO3 to find out whether I can match mine with reported
value.
Here is detail what exactly the Problem is

spgroup 123

Ba 0.0 0 0 0.0 Ba 0.0 0 0 0.0
Ti 0.5 0.5 0.5 Ti 0.5 0.5 0.5
O1 0.5 0.5 0.0 O1 0.5 0.5 0.0
O2 0.5 0.0 0.5 O2 0.5 0.0 0.5
O3 0.0 0.5 0.5

natom 4 natom 5
typat 1 2 3 3 typat 1 2 3 3 3
ETOT -55.***** -68.******
ecut 40
kptopt 1 kptopt 1
nkpt 10 nkpt 10
kptrlen 45 kptrlen 45
In both cases lattice constants are same. and other inputs are also same.
The difference is in first case I used spacegroup and in later atomic
cordinates
are explicitely provided.

Now what I found the Total Energy is different although the case in which
coordinates were input, predicts same space group ie 123.

The only thing that bothers me the energy difference
i used a=b=3.98, c=4.03 and ecut =40 for both run
can anybody throw light on this aspect?

Now I think, This will make my case.
Thank for reply.

With Regards
Santosh Bobade




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page