Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

forum - Re: [abinit-forum] Brillouin zone sampling for supercell calculation

forum@abinit.org

Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )

List archive

Re: [abinit-forum] Brillouin zone sampling for supercell calculation


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Xavier Gonze <gonze@pcpm.ucl.ac.be>
  • To: forum@abinit.org
  • Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] Brillouin zone sampling for supercell calculation
  • Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 08:40:01 +0100

Dear H Megchiche,

homegchiche@yahoo.fr wrote:
Dear Abinit users, Actually, I'm doing the calculation of the vacancy
formation energy of nickel
with the supercell method. I've choosed supercell with 8, 16, 27 and 32
sites. I would like to know
how to choose the compatible brilouin zone sampling (the "ngkpt" input
variable) for each
supercell. Thanks for your help and your time. Sincelly yours. H.megchiche

It is indeed possible to specify grids of k points that will be compatible,
but
you will not succeed with only the ngkpt input variable : you will have to
use either the "kptrlatt" input variable , or complement ngkpt with several
shifts (nshiftk + shiftk) , or (likely the best) to generate automatically
grids
(specified by kptrlatt and the shifts) with the same
resolution, using the "kptlen" input variable. See the description of this
latter input variable. There will be a direct relationship between the
magnification
factor of your supercell, compared to the small Ni cell, and the magnification
factor of kptrlatt.

In any case, you should check with perfectly regular supercells (without
vacancies)
that you get the "same" energy per atom, with these supercells and their
associated
k-point grids. The only difference
should come from the exchange-correlation integration grid, and might be
expected
to be on the order of 10 microHartree.

Good continuation,
Xavier GOnze




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page