forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: "Chun Li " <chun.li@mf.mpg.de>
- To: <forum@abinit.org>
- Subject: RE: [abinit-forum] about the COMMENT
- Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 17:56:19 +0200
- Importance: Normal
Hi, Abinit
users, Could everyone give me some advice on this
COMMENT? Thanks a lot. And one more question: Is it important or
necessary to optimize the lattice parameters before the calculation of band
structures? I use the following lines, optcell 1 ionmov 3 ntime 10 dilatmx 1.1 ecutsm 0.5 But when I just set optcell=0,
the warning message in the logfile indicate not
enough ntime even when I set ntime=500.
And when I set optcell=1 to perform optimization,
there is always an error message indicate not enough dilatmx
(but when I reset dilatmx to the value it suggested,
it just suggests more large values). Maybe someone can help me, Chun Li -----Original Message----- Dear Abinit users, I am trying to calculate the total
energy of a crystal, and defined the unit cell with 4 atoms. However, after
calculation, I always find the following COMMENT in the logfile (colored
lines): symanal : COMMENT - The Bravais lattice determined only from
the primitive vectors, bravais(1)= 6, is more symmetric than the real one, iholohedry= 3, obtained by taking into account the atomic positions. symspgr : the symmetry operation no. 1 is the identity symplanes : the symmetry operation
no. 2 is a mirror plane symaxes : the symmetry operation no. 3 is a 2-axis symplanes : the symmetry operation
no. 4 is a mirror plane symspgr : spgroup= 25
Pm m 2 (=C2v^1) inkpts: Sum of 1 k point weights is 1.000000 Does that mean the atomic positions
I defined in the xred have not been used in the calculation? But why? I want to
know if this COMMENT occurs, will the results still be reliable? If not, how to
solve it then? Thanks a lot in advance. The relative lines in my input file: acell 6.1397 6.1397 9.8379
angdeg 90 90 60 natom 4
typat 2 1 2 1 xred
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5
0.1079 0.5 0.5
0.5041 0.0 0.0
0.5681 |
- about the COMMENT, Chun Li , 07/14/2004
- RE: [abinit-forum] about the COMMENT, Chun Li , 07/14/2004
- RE: [abinit-forum] about the COMMENT, Ke, 07/15/2004
- RE: [abinit-forum] about the COMMENT, Chun Li , 07/14/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.