forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: "Josef W. Zwanziger" <jzwanzig@dal.ca>
- To: <forum@abinit.org>
- Subject: Confusion about ecutsm
- Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 12:55:19 -0300
- Importance: Normal
- Organization: Dalhousie University
Dear Colleagues,
I'm a little confused about what ecutsm does. The explanation in the
help file seems clear enough, but I find the following behavior.
Starting from an experimentally determined crystal structure, I optimize
the atom positions and unit cell dimensions with
ionmov 2
ntime 200
tolmxf 2.0D-5
toldff 2.0D-6
optcell 2
dilatmx 1.1
ecutsm 0.5
This procedure seems to work fine--the crystal structure changes
slightly, with the result that the stress tensor calculated for the
final structure has elements of order 10-8 H/Bohr^3. Then if I take the
output structure (new acell values, new xred values, rprim didn't change
of course) and compute the energy with toldff 2.0D-6, but no ecutsm, the
computed stress tensor rises to nearly 10-5 H/Bohr^3. If I then put back
in the ecutsm 0.5 line, the stress tensor goes back down. Can someone
shed some light on this? I already have ecut set rather high (70 H) and
am using 4x4x4 M-P grid with shiftk 0.5 0.5 0.5.
Thanks much for your help,
Joe
Josef W. Zwanziger tel: (902) 494-1960
Professor of Chemistry and fax: (902) 494-1867
Canada Research Chair in net: jzwanzig@dal.ca
NMR Studies of Materials web: http://jwz.chem.dal.ca
Dept. of Chemistry
Dalhousie University
Halifax, NS
B3H 4J3 CANADA
- Confusion about ecutsm, Josef W. Zwanziger, 08/13/2004
- Re: [abinit-forum] Confusion about ecutsm, Steven Homolya, 08/24/2004
- Re: [abinit-forum] Confusion about ecutsm, Xavier Gonze, 08/25/2004
- Re: [abinit-forum] Confusion about ecutsm, Steven Homolya, 08/24/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.