Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

forum - Re: [abinit-forum] ABINIT PP format

forum@abinit.org

Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )

List archive

Re: [abinit-forum] ABINIT PP format


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Martin Fuchs <fuchs@fhi-berlin.mpg.de>
  • To: forum@abinit.org
  • Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] ABINIT PP format
  • Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 17:38:13 +0200

Hello,

Nichols A. Romero wrote:

Hi,

I was wondering if anyone out there had a program that could convert the
PP output format from the JL Martins ATOM code into one of the ABINIT
formats. I would generate the PP with fhi98PP but it actually seems to
fail, complaining about convergence.

fhi98pp is perfectly capable of generating a 5f pseudopotential (although for other 5d elements,
many pseudopotential plane-wave studies have worked [satisfactorily so] with just spd potentials).
You might want to start from the ini file (LDA):
77.00 12 3 8 0.00 : z nc nv iexc rnlc
1 0 2.00 : n l f
2 0 2.00
2 1 6.00
3 0 2.00
3 1 6.00
3 2 10.00
4 0 2.00
4 1 6.00
4 2 10.00
4 3 14.00
5 0 2.00
5 1 6.00
5 2 8.00
6 0 1.00
6 1 0.00
3 t : lmax s_pp_def
1 0.00 10.00 t : lt rct et s_pp_type

Note that 5f is not listed as a (bound) valence state, the f pseudopotential is obtained from
a scattering state following Don Hamann's procedure. It is the LDA that fails to bind the
(unoccupied!) 5f state. If you include f and want to use the pseudopotential in fully separable
(Kleinman-Bylander) form in ABINIT, make sure that there are no ghost states.

Best regards,
Martin


Does anyone know if there are any significant differences in how the
Hamann procedure for unbound states is implemented between these codes?
In my case, it is failing for 5f of Iridium in fhi98pp but it succeeds
ATOM code.

Bests,


--
Martin Fuchs
Phone: +30 8413 4802 | Fritz-Haber-Institut der MPG
Fax: +30 8413 4701 | Faradayweg 4-6
E-Mail: fuchs@fhi-berlin.mpg.de | D-14195 Berlin (Germany)

1-0.0735-11600-23.05





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page