forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: yukihiro_okuno@fujifilm.co.jp
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: Re: Re: Re: [abinit-forum] On the latticed optimization
- Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 02:17:35 +0100
Dear Abinit Users.
I'm now testing the calculation of fcc-lattice
of the Pb for lattice optimization.
I use Teter's extended norm-conserving pseudo
potential which I downloaded from the ABINIT site.
The results and calculation depends on the initial
guess of acell or scaling of relation of the acell
and rprim.
On the initial acell,
I had first sets acell = 9.3548995339E+00 ( corresponds
latticd constant of the fcc cube), the calculation of
the results failed with the massage
BROYDEN STEP NUMBER 3
------------------------------------------------------
metric : ERROR -
Current rprimd gives negative (R1xR2).R3 .
Rprimd = 0.000000E+00 -1.073389E-01 -1.073389E-01
-1.073389E-01 0.000000E+00 -1.073389E-01
-1.073389E-01 -1.073389E-01 0.000000E+00
and, if I set acell = 10.00 I can get the conversed
results.
But the conversed results is that acell = 1.0345762121E+01
which is rather larger than the experimental vales,
a = 9.353198. Basically is the origin of the discrepancy
due to the pseudo-potential of lead ?
And On the scaling relation of acell and rprim, I set
acell = a/sqrt(2), and rprim = 0, 1/sqrt(2), 1/sqrt(2)
( for example), the calculation is also failed with the
message, ( in this case I set rather small value of dilatmx)
The new primitive vectors rprimd (an evolving quantity)
are too large with respect to the old rprimd and the accompanying dilatmx :
this large change of unit cell parameters is not allowed by the present
value of dilatmx.
You need at least dilatmx= 1.657208E+00)
I use ABINIT-4.2.3 on the DOS/WIn-Intel-PGI version.
Sincerely,
Yukihir Okuno.
The results of the lattice optimization of fcc-Pb crystal
with Teter's pseudo potential. the experimental
value of the lattice constant of fcc cube is 9.353198.
-outvars: echo values of variables after computation --------
acell 1.0345762121E+01 1.0345762121E+01 1.0345762121E+01 Bohr
amu 2.07200000E+02
diemac 1.20000000E+01
dilatmx 2.00000000E+00
ecut 4.00000000E+01 Hartree
ecutsm 5.00000000E+00 Hartree
etotal -5.9806901453E+01
fcart 0.0000000000E+00 0.0000000000E+00 0.0000000000E+00
ionmov 2
ixc 3
Here is my input file.
#Definition of the unit cell
optcell 1
ionmov 2
ntime 20
dilatmx 2.0
ptrwf 0
acell 10.0 10.0 10.0
rprim 0.000000000000 0.5 0.5
0.5 0.000000000000 0.5
0.5 0.5 0.000000000000
ntypat 1
znucl 82
natom 1
typat 1
xcart
0.000000000000 0.000000000000 0.000000000000
tsmear 0.04
kptopt 1
ngkpt 8 8 8
ecut 40
ecutsm 5.0
ixc 3
nstep 10
toldff 1.0d-7
diemac 12.0
- Re: Re: [abinit-forum] On the latticed optimization, yukihiro_okuno, 11/23/2004
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Re: Re: [abinit-forum] On the latticed optimization, yukihiro_okuno, 11/25/2004
- Re: Re: Re: [abinit-forum] On the latticed optimization, m-takahashi, 11/25/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.