Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

forum - Re: [abinit-forum] The error of atomisation energy of oxygen

forum@abinit.org

Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )

List archive

Re: [abinit-forum] The error of atomisation energy of oxygen


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Masayoshi Mikami <mmikami@yk.rim.or.jp>
  • To: forum@abinit.org
  • Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] The error of atomisation energy of oxygen
  • Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2004 18:04:54 +0900
  • Organization: Yokohama citizen

Hello,

I have little time, but wanted to point out several things:
1) Please read textbooks, about O2 molecule;
O2 should be treated as
nspol 2
spinat 0.0 0.0 1.0
0.0 0.0 1.0
see Test_v1/t09.in for example to see how to set "occ"/"occopt"
(test cases including "oxygen" can be found by typing
grep -i oxygen Test*/*.in
Then, the Test_v1/t09 is noticed as such a example...)
(It will be a good idea to try Test_* in this occasion.)

2) Which type of O pseudopotential(PP) is adopted ?
Sufficient ecut may depends on the type of the PP...

3) How about adopting the special k-point (0.25, 0.25, 0.25)
for simple cubic supercel ?

4) Kindly read the netiquette
http://www.abinit.org/community/?text=netiquette
and try to avoid HTML e-mails; in Plain Text, please...

Good luck,
Masayoshi

On Sat, 4 Dec 2004 10:37:53 +0800 (CST)
"Zhenhua Zeng" <myid520@163.com> wrote:

> Dear abinit users,
> Now, I want to predict using oxygen. So I test some well-known
> situations, such as bond length and bond energy (atomisation energy) of
> oxygen. The error of bond length is less than 1%. But the error of bond
> energy is very large. The calculated result using every pseudo potential
> downloaded from the web cite is between 8.5ev and 9.7ev. But The
> experimental data is 5.12ev. The result calculated using VASP and CASTEP
> are between 5.5ev and 6.5ev. The input file is given at below which based
> on Tutorial\t21.in. In the input file, the acell and ecut have been tested
> for the convergence of calculation. I want to know why it differs so much
> from experimental data and other calculations Does there have something
> wrong in my input file, the method used in tutorial to calculate bond
> energy (atomisation energy) can’t be used here, Or there has something
> wrong else? In addition, Can I use oxygen for prediction only depends on
> the good tested result of bond length? Your help !
will be greatly appreciated!
> Best regards.
> Zhenhua Zeng
> Hunan University, PR. china
>
> #### input files ##############
> #calculate oxygen molecular and atom
> #common parameters
> ndtset 2
> ixc 1 or ixc 3 or ixc 7 or ixc 11 for different pseudo potential
> acell 3*12 Bohr
> ecut 30.0 Hatree
> nstep 100
> ngkpt 2 2 2
> kptopt 1
> ntypat 1
> znucl 8
> diemac 1.0
> diemix 0.5
>
> #the parameters for oxygen atoms
> nsppol1 2 ##SPin POLarization calculation of oxygen atom
> spinat1 0.0 0.0 1.0
> natom1 1
> typat1 1
> xcart1 3*0.0
> toldfe1 1.0d-6
>
> #The parameters for oxygen molecular
> natom2 2
> typat2 1 1
> xcart2 -1.145 0.0 0.0 #the bond length of oxygen molecular is
> 1.145 0.0 0.0 #about 2.29 Bohr
> ionmov2 3
> ntime2 100
> tolmxf2 5.0d-5
> toldff2 5.0d-6


--
----------------------------------------------
Masayoshi Mikami (Yokohama, Japan)
home: mmikami@yk.rim.or.jp
webmail: mmikami_yk@yahoo.co.jp
----------------------------------------------



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page