Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

forum - Re: [abinit-forum] problem with C2 calculation

forum@abinit.org

Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )

List archive

Re: [abinit-forum] problem with C2 calculation


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Matthieu Verstraete <verstraete@pcpm.ucl.ac.be>
  • To: forum@abinit.org
  • Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] problem with C2 calculation
  • Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 17:46:36 +0100 (MET)


Hi,

you should send in fuller inputs and outputs. your energy tolerance is not
very tight, but especially I have no idea what happens when diemix is 0. That
means your results are probably pure noise. Read its definition and set it to
0.5 or 1.

If you have a real problem, it could be you need to add ecutsm different from
0.0, but this seems to be a much bigger problem.

Matthieu



Quoting apirath@hpcc.nectec.or.th:

> Hi all,
>
> I have a problem in determining the bond length of a Carbon dimer
> molecule.
> I have calculated the total-energy curve as a function of the seperation
> between C atoms, and I found that there was a "discontinuity" in the
> total-energy curve. The calculated forces were competely wrong as well.
>
>
> THIS IS MY RESULTS ----------------------------
> distance(angstrom) etotal(Ha) force(Ha/Bohr)
> 1.20 -1.1651337270E+01 1.3031579214E-01
> 1.21 -1.1654900731E+01 1.3727504151E-01
> 1.22 -1.1657978193E+01 1.4365447983E-01
> 1.23 -1.1660595870E+01 1.4949382326E-01
> 1.24 -1.1662778804E+01 1.5483024408E-01
> 1.25 -1.1664550918E+01 1.5969856326E-01
> 1.26 -1.1665935074E+01 1.6413199426E-01
> 1.27 -1.1666953111E+01 1.6816076344E-01
> 1.28 -1.1667625891E+01 1.7181292372E-01
> 1.29 -1.1667973365E+01 1.7511469508E-01
> 1.30 -1.1668014577E+01 1.7808921357E-01
> 1.31 -1.1667767719E+01 1.8075753719E-01
> 1.32 -1.1667250181E+01 1.8313998960E-01
> 1.33 -1.1666478571E+01 1.8525566926E-01
> 1.34 -1.1665468752E+01 1.8712238288E-01
> 1.35 -1.1664235868E+01 1.8875757765E-01
> 1.36 -1.1662794390E+01 1.9017574862E-01
> 1.37 -1.1661158127E+01 1.9139192204E-01
> 1.38 -1.1659340222E+01 1.9241851915E-01
> 1.39 -1.1657353280E+01 1.9326725253E-01
> 1.40 -1.1655209271E+01 1.9394818125E-01
> 1.41 -1.1652919625E+01 1.9447164545E-01
> 1.42 -1.1650495230E+01 1.9484767225E-01
> 1.425 -1.1649235767E+01 1.9498321914E-01
> 1.43 -1.1647946464E+01 1.9508545971E-01
> 1.44 -1.1645283198E+01 1.9519402188E-01
> 1.444 -1.1644187951E+01 1.9520318369E-01
> 1.448 -1.1630758882E+01 6.8353016987E-02 <<=== !! Discontinous !!
> 1.45 -1.1630603864E+01 6.9325554195E-02
> 1.452 -1.1630444414E+01 7.0286281207E-02
> 1.456 -1.1630112457E+01 7.2172709473E-02
> 1.46 -1.1629763477E+01 7.4013056829E-02
> 1.47 -1.1628819530E+01 7.8416984820E-02
> --------------------------------------------
>
> THIS IS MY INPUT------------------
> the pseudopotential file = 6c.pspnc
>
> ndtset 15
>
>
> #Definition of the unit cell
> acell 40 40 40 angstrom
>
>
> #Definition of the atom types
> ntypat 1
> znucl 6
>
>
> #Definition of the atoms
> natom 2
> typat 1 1
> xangst:
> 6.00 6.0 6.0
> 7.20 6.0 6.0
>
>
> xangst+
> 0.00 0.0 0.0
> 0.02 0.0 0.0
>
>
> #Definition of the planewave basis set
> ecut 60.0
>
>
> #Definition of the k-point grid
> nkpt 1
>
>
> #Definition of the SCF procedure
> nstep 100
> toldfe 1.0d-6
> diemac 3.0
> diemix 0.0
> ----------------------------------
> I used "ABINIT version 4.3.3" compiled by intel compiler "efc" with the
> "MKL library".
> This run on "Itanium2" and OS is "Linux".
>
> Could anyone please check the result and tell me what's wrong with this
> calculation.
>
> Thank you,
> Apirath
>


-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: atlas.pcpm.ucl.ac.be

----- End forwarded message -----


-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: atlas.pcpm.ucl.ac.be



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page