Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

forum - Re: STM Images

forum@abinit.org

Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )

List archive

Re: STM Images


Chronological Thread 
  • From: verstraete@pcpm.ucl.ac.be
  • To: forum@abinit.org, Adriano de Souza Martins <martins@pcpm.ucl.ac.be>
  • Subject: Re: STM Images
  • Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 17:51:52 +0100 (CET)


Hello Adriano, I'm forwarding this to the whole forum, as it looks wierd to me:

in the case prtstm 1, everything should be fixed except the occupations, and hence the correct tolerance is tolwfr. Strangely, in the input checking for prtstm, if tolwfr is below 1.0e-6 then it exits... This should not be an error, but it is in chkinp.F90 and the automatic test uses 1.0e-6.

Set tolwfr to 1.0e-6 and it will run. There should not be any error associated with this, as the wavefunctions are already there, and only the density for the correct states needs to be output. We want to avoid abinit making any erroneous re-convergence of the wavefunctions, but still, tolwfr should not be producing an error if it's 1.0e-18 (a common non-zero value). Xavier?

Bye

Matthieu

--
===================================================================
Matthieu Verstraete mailto:verstraete@pcpm.ucl.ac.be PCPM, Boltzmann, pl. Croix du Sud, 1 tel: 010/ 47 33 59
B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve Belgium fax: 010/ 47 34 52


  • Re: STM Images, verstraete, 01/26/2005

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page