Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

forum - Re: Re: [abinit-forum] On the accuracy of the responce calculation (DFPT).

forum@abinit.org

Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )

List archive

Re: Re: [abinit-forum] On the accuracy of the responce calculation (DFPT).


Chronological Thread 
  • From: verstraete@pcpm.ucl.ac.be
  • To: forum@abinit.org
  • Subject: Re: Re: [abinit-forum] On the accuracy of the responce calculation (DFPT).
  • Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 14:29:28 +0100 (CET)


I can answer for the last question at least: an extra input file is added to anaddb for electron-phonon interactions. Just put a random file name stuff_GKK: as long as you don't set elphflag 1 in the input file, it won't be read, but a filename _must_ be entered in the anaddb files file.

If your acoustic modes are non-zero, something is not converged yet. The bad convergence is often associated to the pseudopotential (I already have a post or two on this - read the archive). If you try another the acoustic modes may be much better. Imposing the ASR may improve your piezoelectric constants too. The only systematic way to reduce the acoustic modes is increasing ecut. What are your stresses like? Choosing experimental lattice parameters and relaxing the ions is kind of a half-baked idea. Rigorously you should relax everything.


Matthieu


--
===================================================================
Matthieu Verstraete mailto:verstraete@pcpm.ucl.ac.be PCPM, Boltzmann, pl. Croix du Sud, 1 tel: +32 10 47 33 59
B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve Belgium fax: +32 10 47 34 52


  • Re: Re: [abinit-forum] On the accuracy of the responce calculation (DFPT)., verstraete, 02/03/2005

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page