Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

forum - Re: [abinit-forum] How to get rid of the warning "The dynamical matrix was incomplete : phonon frequencies may be wrong ..."

forum@abinit.org

Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )

List archive

Re: [abinit-forum] How to get rid of the warning "The dynamical matrix was incomplete : phonon frequencies may be wrong ..."


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Xavier Gonze <gonze@pcpm.ucl.ac.be>
  • To: forum@abinit.org
  • Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] How to get rid of the warning "The dynamical matrix was incomplete : phonon frequencies may be wrong ..."
  • Date: Mon, 02 May 2005 14:23:33 +0200

Dear Zhufeng,

In your input file, you required only a few perturbations to be calculated,
because
of your choice of the input variable :
rfatpol3 1 2
In order to compute the full dynamical matrix, it should be :
rfatpol3 1 6
because you have 6 atoms per unit cell.
The code does not complain about you not willing to compute all perturbations
(you can
use mrgddb to complete the DDBs, using another run), but it gives you
correctly the warning that
the dynamical matrix is incomplete, and that the phonon frequencies delivered
at that place might not be what you want.
Actually, you computed only the reponse to Zr displacements, so that is it
sure that
the frequencies are wrong. This warning has nothing to do with
cutoff energy, k-points and convergence tolerance ...

Xavier

zfhou@mail.edu.cn wrote:
Dear abinit users,

I have tried to calculate the dielectric tensor of HfO2 with tetragonal
structure containing 12
atoms or 6 atoms, using Hartwigsen-Goedecker-Hutter LDA psp for Hf and O. In
my calculation, the
cutoff energy is 35 Ha and the k-point mesh is 7 x 7 x 5. However the warning
"The dynamical matrix
was incomplete : phonon frequencies may be wrong ..." occured in output file.
Except the
increasment of cutoff energy, k-points and convergence tolerance, is there
any other rule-of thumb
to get rid of this warning?

I have tested to increase the k-point mesh and convergence tolerance, this
warning can't be
removed.

In addtion, I have used the same pseduopotentials and cutoff energy to
calculate the cubic HfO2.
Although I got a larger dielectric tensor than the values in
PRB69,184301(2004)(G.-M.Rignanese, et
al), there was no such waning in the calculation.

Your suggestions and helps will be greatly appreciated! zhufeng

----------input file for tetragonal HfO2-------- ndtset 3

#Ground state calculation kptopt1 1 tolvrs1 1.0d-18 iscf1 5

#Response Function calculation : d/dk rfelfd2 2 rfdir2 1 1 1 nqpt2 1
qpt2 0.0 0.0 0.0

getwfk2 -1 kptopt2 2 iscf2 -3 tolwfr2 1.0d-18

#Response Function calculation : electric field perturbation and phonons
rfphon3 1 rfatpol3 1 2
rfelfd3 3 rfdir3 1 1 1

nqpt3 1 qpt3 0.0 0.0 0.0

getwfk3 -2 getddk3 -1

kptopt3 2 tolvrs3 1.0d-10 iscf3 5

#Definition of the unit cell acell 6.7261613019E+00 6.7261613019E+00
9.7644094669E+00 angdeg
90.0 90.0 90.0

#Definition of the atom types spgroup 137 ntypat 2 znucl 72 8 natom 6 typat
2*1 4*2 xred
0.0000000000E+00 0.0000000000E+00 0.0000000000E+00 5.0000000000E-01
5.0000000000E-01
5.0000000000E-01 0.0000000000E+00 5.0000000000E-01 1.9835156639E-01
0.0000000000E+00
5.0000000000E-01 6.9835156639E-01 5.0000000000E-01 0.0000000000E+00 -1.9835156639E-01 5.0000000000E-01 0.0000000000E+00 3.0164843361E-01

#Definition of the k-point grid ngkpt 7 7 5

#Definition of the SCF procedure ecut 35.0 nstep 60 diemac 3.0 nband 60 ixc 2 ----------------------END-------------------------------------







Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page