forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: verstraete@pcpm.ucl.ac.be
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] Convergence problems
- Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 17:27:27 +0200 (CEST)
No problem, I sympathize.
For the box convergence, density is a bad criterion. Energy variation is better (bigger box, same energy) but the best is converged bond length, or at least force components on atoms (relax the positions for different box sizes until the bond lengths are the same for successive boxes).
So what works? Bigger box or restarting the calculation?
Cheers
Matthieu
--
================================================================
Matthieu Verstraete mailto:verstraete@pcpm.ucl.ac.be PCPM, Boltzmann, pl. Croix du Sud, 1 tel: +32 10 47 33 59
B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve Belgium fax: +32 10 47 34 52
- Convergence problems, Eduardo Cruz Silva, 05/10/2005
- Re: [abinit-forum] Convergence problems, verstraete, 05/10/2005
- Re: [abinit-forum] Convergence problems, Eduardo Cruz Silva, 05/10/2005
- Re: [abinit-forum] Convergence problems, verstraete, 05/11/2005
- Re: [abinit-forum] Convergence problems, Eduardo Cruz Silva, 05/11/2005
- Re: [abinit-forum] Convergence problems, verstraete, 05/11/2005
- Re: [abinit-forum] Convergence problems, D. R. Hamann, 05/11/2005
- Re: [abinit-forum] Convergence problems, Eduardo Cruz Silva, 05/11/2005
- Re: [abinit-forum] Convergence problems, verstraete, 05/11/2005
- Re: [abinit-forum] Convergence problems, Eduardo Cruz Silva, 05/10/2005
- Re: [abinit-forum] Convergence problems, verstraete, 05/10/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.