Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

forum - tolvrs vs. toldfe

forum@abinit.org

Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )

List archive

tolvrs vs. toldfe


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Nichols A. Romero" <naromero@gmail.com>
  • To: forum@abinit.org
  • Subject: tolvrs vs. toldfe
  • Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2005 10:47:00 -0500
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=gDSwxf5dT7YYukC4xVEc7LRPv0rTJVbu/HYH/X8g+WHrOqufouKhLWec/GmtTtv8q579wszoVdmPtDAL2P9jgDb8oENtA6IPn1JCNYTPeIKY8v5ByyK6ZyXQrKgbQa/U/IP1hsYGmT77MVc/Nf9r6mPU3AzUuTSRGTD9IOuTNvc=

Hi,

In the ABINIT online manual,
http://www.abinit.org/Infos_v4.5/varbas.html#tolwfr

it states in reference to using tolwfr that
"this criterion should be replaced by those based on toldfe (preferred for ionmov==0), toldff (preferred for ionmov/=0) or tolvrs (preferred for theoretical reasons!)."

I would think that in general, the best criterion for stopping the SCF is tolvrs since when self-consistency is reached it is true that
V_scf^in = V_scf^out

and

n^in = n^out

Especially in response calculation, I've noticed that using something other than tolvrs, e.g. toldfe could be potentially problematic. Isn't possible that under certain circumstances toldfe could be reached much faster than its equivalent value for tolvrs?
If its possible to speak of an equivalent value for tolvrs.

--
Nichols A. Romero
4-133 ESB, MC 704                508 E. Michigan Avenue
1110 West Green Street          Apartment 12
Urbana, IL 61801-3080            Urbana, IL 61801-5176
(217) 333-6108                       (217) 417-5210

  • tolvrs vs. toldfe, Nichols A. Romero, 07/02/2005

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page