forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: Andrew Johnson <andyjohnso@gmail.com>
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: GW calculation in InN
- Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2005 11:00:39 -0700
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=QriZnYyrxZ7nE7RPi+ciSghb4Leh1P/SxvESuseyM3XC1Lvelq9i5QHVnWLhb6/bYdZuCY95+xY0LuprsluIEh/Vd2WIDgbLobkpWUzKhUZTqMOS5WCjViqeplBNIxWHkVmwfgKtPdz4Km7TvcuYD/kD4qLoivRbEx3w33fmN14=
Dear all,
I am a newbie of GW calculation. Recently I've been trying to do some GW calculation in InN but it was not successful. There is a tutorial about Si which I followed up quite smoothly but InN seems to be a tougher system to play with.
It is to my understanding that in ABINIT GWA is initialized from the LDA KS orbitals and energies, and the problem arises in InN since LDA in fact predicts a negative band gap due to an overestimation of the pd repulsion. That in consequence gives a bad initial starting point for the rest GW calculation. Moreover, a significant change in the dielectric properties from metal to semiconductors is expected. The dielectric constant (since it's "metal") is too large to be printed out in the output file (instead, it only prints *******). I even had trouble with convergence test on the number of planewave to calculate the screening. I wonder if GW calculation in ABINIT code is capable of dealing with such a case where the substantial change from a metal to semiconductor is anticipated. By the way, I use the FHI pseudopotentials for N and In (4d semi-core included). Thanks.
Andrew
- GW calculation in InN, Andrew Johnson, 09/09/2005
- Re: [abinit-forum] GW calculation in InN, Scott P. Beckman, 09/09/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.