Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

forum - Interpreting the merit_factor

forum@abinit.org

Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )

List archive

Interpreting the merit_factor


Chronological Thread 
  • From: jzwanzig@dal.ca
  • To: forum@abinit.org
  • Subject: Interpreting the merit_factor
  • Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 20:54:23 +0100

Dear Colleagues,

When using the "prtkpt = 1" option to view suggestions for the kpt grid, the
ending summary includes the value of the "merit_factor". I've read through
the source code where this is calculated but am still a little unclear as to
how to intrepret it. Does the merit_factor indicate that any grid with a
higher merit factor will be more accurate than any grid with a lower merit
factor, regardless of the associated values of nkpt or kptrlen, or does it
mean that, for a two grids with similar values of kptrlen, the one with the
higher merit factor will be better? Somehow I would have thought that
physically kptrlen would be the most important indicator of grid quality, but
that some grids, due to symmetry, achieve a given kptrlen more efficiently
than others. Any comments on these issues would be helpful. Thanks much--

Joe Zwanziger



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page