Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

forum - Re: [abinit-forum] Non-zero Berry phase in system with inversionoperator

forum@abinit.org

Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )

List archive

Re: [abinit-forum] Non-zero Berry phase in system with inversionoperator


Chronological Thread 
  • From: David Vanderbilt <dhv@physics.rutgers.edu>
  • To: forum@abinit.org
  • Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] Non-zero Berry phase in system with inversionoperator
  • Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:54:58 -0500 (EST)

Dear all,

The Berry phase does not have to be zero in a system with inversion
symmetry. For example, consider a 1D system where the "+1 ions"
are at x=0, a, 2a, etc, and the electron Wannier centers are at
x=-a/2, a/2, 3a/2, etc. Then the Berry phase is pi, not zero.

Something similar happens for centrosymmetric ionic systems. For
example, the Berry phases of CsCl and KNbO3 are pi, and not zero,
In such cases, one should be practical and report an "effective
polarization" that is defined relative to that of the
centrosymmetric structure (so that it is zero by definition in the
centrosymmetric structure). But one still needs to be aware that
the raw Berry-phase polarizations coming out of the calculation
will not be zero.

Raffaele Resta and I have written two manuscripts that attempt to
explain some of the tricky physical issues associated with the
theory of polarization. These are intended to be published as book
chapters; for copyright reasons, I have not posted them on my
publications web site, but I will be more than happy to send a
draft preprint (for personal use only) to anybody who requests
it. See

http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/~dhv/pub_list.html#182
http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/~dhv/pub_list.html#190

The latter one addresses more specifically the issue raised in
this thread.

David Vanderbilt


On Thu, 9 Feb 2006, Vincenzo Fiorentini wrote:

I am not an expert on how abinit computes Berry phases,
but I suspect this results is consistent with your
expectation. The Berry phase is defined modulo a lattice
translation (Phys. Rev. B 47, 1651 (1993)), so probably
your number *is* indeed zero in that convention.

best - V. Fiorentini


On 9 Feb 2006, at 2:12 PM, Konstantin Rushchanskii wrote:

Dear all,

I'm trying to calculate the polarization of a low-symmetry monoclinic
compound
Sn2P2S6 (space group Nom. 14), containing the inversion symmetry.
In this case, the resulting polarization should be zero.

Unfortunately, it is zero only for the ionic part, but not for the
electron one.
Electronic Berry phase is exatly equal to 1, and as a result the total
polarization
is non-zero. The input file with simplyfied conditions is given below
(the case with berryopt -1).
Moreover, the results are similar also for berryopt 1.

ABINIT identifies the space group correctly.

How can I treat this result?
Does it mean that the problem is related to the setting of the
crystalline structure?

I have found similar problem in the letter of Jian ZHOU (16 Jun 2005),
but there were no answers to this question.


Thank you in advance,
K.Rushchanskii



log_file -----------------------------
Computing the polarization (Berry phase) for reciprocal vector:
0.00000 0.25000 0.00000 (in reduced coordinates)
0.00000 0.01766 0.00000 (in cartesian coordinates - atomic units)
Number of strings: 16
Number of k points in string: 4

Compute the electronic contribution to polarization

istr polberry(istr)
1 0.100000000E+01
2 0.100000000E+01
3 0.100000000E+01
4 0.100000000E+01
5 0.100000000E+01
6 0.100000000E+01
7 0.100000000E+01
8 0.100000000E+01
9 0.100000000E+01
10 0.100000000E+01
11 0.100000000E+01
12 0.100000000E+01
13 0.100000000E+01
14 0.100000000E+01
15 0.100000000E+01
16 0.100000000E+01
total 0.100000000E+01 (isppol= 1)

Compute the ionic contributions
...

Summary of the results
Electronic Berry phase 1.000000000E+00
Ionic phase -1.221245327E-15
Total phase 1.000000000E+00
Remapping in [-1,1] 1.000000000E+00

Polarization 4.567594984E-03 (a.u. of charge)/bohr^2
Polarization 2.613338624E-01 C/m^2

log_file -----------------------------




-------------------------
input.ini
-------------------------


ndtset 2
nstep 10


acell 9.362 7.493 6.55 Angstrom
angdeg 90 91.2 90

xred
0.24310 0.36920 0.95890
0.25690 0.86920 0.54110
0.75690 0.63080 0.04110
0.74310 0.13080 0.45890
0.06710 0.39140 0.43940
0.43290 0.89140 0.06060
0.93290 0.60860 0.56060
0.56710 0.10860 0.93940
0.26290 0.49750 0.39910
0.23710 0.99750 0.10090
0.73710 0.50250 0.60090
0.76290 0.00250 0.89910
0.96720 0.30900 0.17720
0.53280 0.80900 0.32280
0.03280 0.69100 0.82280
0.46720 0.19100 0.67720
0.05700 0.19760 0.65580
0.44300 0.69760 0.84420
0.94300 0.80240 0.34420
0.55700 0.30240 0.15580

ntypat 3
znucl 50 15 16
natom 20
typat 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
nband 54

ngkpt 2 2 2
ecut 2 Ha


kptopt1 1
toldfe1 1.0d-3
iscf1 5
prtden1 1

berryopt2 -1
rfdir2 0 1 0
iscf2 -2
kptopt2 1
ngkpt2 4 4 4
getden2 1
tolwfr2 1.0d-4



------------------------------------------------------------------------
Prof. David Vanderbilt Phone: (732) 445-2514
Department of Physics and Astronomy Fax: (732) 445-4400
Rutgers University Email: dhv@physics.rutgers.edu
136 Frelinghuysen Road http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/~dhv
Piscataway, NJ 08854-8019 USA
------------------------------------------------------------------------


  • Re: [abinit-forum] Non-zero Berry phase in system with inversionoperator, David Vanderbilt, 02/14/2006

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page