Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

forum - Re: [abinit-forum] Forces convergence_again

forum@abinit.org

Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )

List archive

Re: [abinit-forum] Forces convergence_again


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Anglade Pierre-Matthieu" <anglade@gmail.com>
  • To: forum@abinit.org
  • Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] Forces convergence_again
  • Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 12:01:06 +0200
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=k/BAQBUATQmEu3jU2AJDpfqZ1jsfUAllquKKizLRsjr5ATavE/bVYu5ZWM5g9y/mMDXSBwJupe9+y3kgHTMWuGBhtc8cqwUeomZVjkLBuTt/HEg7I2Ho9nE9nB6wZDmNBR5SOzHspYcM+W9ghiFJOJDeEEVuFqTl/cCBS/vLXrE=

To get reallistic dynamic you only need energy conservation then
absolute convergence is needed only for energy. You need only a nice
real SCF convergency for MD (nnsclo and nline increased for large
cells). And having your forces converge to 10^-5 (or -6) Ha/bohr in
the scf is already enough (unless your workin with H, He, Li).

On 3/30/06, Nuno Galamba <ngalamba@cii.fc.ul.pt> wrote:
> Dear Dr Xavier
>
> That is definitely the ideal situation. The problem is, to get significant
> results one needs a reasonable time of simulation. That requires a
> significant amount of computational time. I am therefore trying to come up
> with a reasonable set of input parameters before I start such simulation. In
> addition this may even decide wether I do have the computational resources
> for even thinking about doing such a simulation. That is why I could benefit
> from someone else's experience on this problems.
>
> Thanks
>
> N. Galamba
>


--
Pierre-Matthieu Anglade




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page