Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

forum - Re: [abinit-forum] advanced options of GW (from the webpage)

forum@abinit.org

Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )

List archive

Re: [abinit-forum] advanced options of GW (from the webpage)


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Valerio Olevano <valerio.olevano@grenoble.cnrs.fr>
  • To: forum@abinit.org
  • Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] advanced options of GW (from the webpage)
  • Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 21:43:02 +0200
  • Organization: CNRS LEPES

Salut Fabien
il n'y a pas enocre documentation des variables
mais si j'ai bien compris:

Fabien Bruneval wrote:
_ gwcalctyp
0 ppm
1 analytic cont (as tu insere aussi cette partie?)
2 deformation contour
_ nfreqim
nombre de freq imaginaires pour epsilon (choisie pour faire l'integration a la Gauss? pour aller de 0 jusqu'a infini donc 1/omega + shift?)
_ nfreqre
nombre de freq sur l'axe reel de omegas
_ freqremax
maximum de freq sur l'axe reel
_ nfreqsp
? c'est quoi. nombre des freq pour calculer sigma sur l'axe reel?
_ freqspmax
freq max sur l'axe reel?

est-ce qu'il y a d'autre? quels sont les variables
pour la self-consistence? a ton avis qu'est-ce qu'il y a
des developpements nouveaux a ne pas perdre?
merci de me faire savoir
ciao
valerio




If you want examples of input files, please look at the test files numbers 84 - 88 in directory tests/v4/.

In case you have further questions, don't hesitate...

Have nice calculations.


Fabien



mperez@mpi-halle.mpg.de wrote:

Dear Fabien,

thanks for your email with detailed information and the references (thesis).
According to the info in the abinit website for version 5.1.2, your
implementation of GW allows for some "advanced options" not previously
available. Probably you remember i was asking on extracting the
quasiparticle states. Well, this is referred to in the website as well as
the really helpful option to extract the spectral function.

In order to run fully dynamical (ie expensive) GW, rather than plasmon
pole model, which is explained in the website on "advanced options"
(Calculations without using the Plasmon-Pole model ), i seem to remember
the former version of the code had two inner logical parameters
analytic_continuation and contour_deformation, which can be used instead of
plasmon_pole_model, in which case probably no extra input's are required
(as compared to the tutorials files). But since you developed this new
version, you probably included extra inputs/options???
I am just wondering whether for this advanced option (no plasmon pole
model), i should ask you for some example input file or there is no need
for that.

thanks

Manolo





begin:vcard
fn:Valerio Olevano
n:Olevano;Valerio
org:CNRS Grenoble;LEPES
adr:BP 166;;25, avenue des Martyrs;Grenoble;;38042;France
email;internet:valerio.olevano@grenoble.cnrs.fr
tel;work:+33-4-76887467
tel;fax:+33-4-76887988
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://theory.polytechnique.fr/people/olevano/
version:2.1
end:vcard




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page