Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

forum - Re: [abinit-forum] Problem about e-ph coupling in ABINIT

forum@abinit.org

Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )

List archive

Re: [abinit-forum] Problem about e-ph coupling in ABINIT


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Matthieu Verstraete <mjv500@york.ac.uk>
  • To: "forum@abinit.org" <forum@abinit.org>
  • Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] Problem about e-ph coupling in ABINIT
  • Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 10:33:34 +0100 (BST)


In PRB 53,R7575, the scatting matrix element of e-ph Hamiltonian seems have no relation to the phonon amplitude? In the article, equation (1), the Hamiltonian in the middle is just the phonon polarization vector times the gradient of the self-consistent potential. This is quite different compared with the equations in Mahan's "Many particle Physics".
the perturbed hamiltonian should be dotted into the phonon displacement vector. The difference with the polarization vector is the 1/sqrt(M) which is present in eq (1). In Amy we trust!

Another question: Also in the PRB article,equation (2), there are two delta function delta(Enk-Ef)*delta(En'k'-Ef). Does this mean before and after scattering with phonon,the electron states should both have the same energy,which equals to Ef?
yes.

This is strange. I'm interesting in the scatting of phonons and non-equilibrium "hot" electrons, If the ABINIT code could only handle the e-ph coupling just at the fermi level, it will be a great depression to me.
Well... valium? Or check the publications by Mauri and Ferrari on hot phonons. PWSCF may be able to do something. Or you can code in abinit. It shouldn't be a huge change, but I haven't looked at it in detail. For the moment the FS is taken into account with either the tetrahedron method or a smearing width. With the latter you can increase the temperature and get a wider contribution to the FS. That's a start, but there should also be something about the finite T of the phonons themselves somewhere. Dunno.

The third question: dose the GKK file contain the scattering matrix elements? I can't understand its format.Can someone tell me how the bulk S-matrix data organised in the GKK file? Can I find a detailed explaination of the format,and the meaning of date in such *.ep_* files?
The gkk file contains the raw perturbations generated by abinit from phonon runs: perturbation of 1 atom in 1 reduced direction for 1 qpoint, for all atoms and directions but for the irreducible qpoints only. If you look at the input for mrggkk you can set the output to ascii text if you really want to look at them (huge file though). In the latest version (released in a few days) you'll have access to flags which let you write the actual gkk matrix used in the code to disk instead of keeping everything in memory. However these matrices contain an intermediate quantity used for interpolation

gamma=<psi_k+q | H_q,a,idir | psi_k > <psi_k | H_q,b,jdir | psi_k+q>

or the same thing dotted with the displacement vectors then rotated to the cartesian reference frame (q dropped, sum over everything):

e^j_a',idir' d^j_a,idir gamma d^j_b,jdir e^j_b',jdir'

Anyhow, this may not answer your question, but if you want the standard g_kk' matrices out you will have to write a few lines of code in src/07ddb/completeperts.F90 and src/07ddb/nmsq_gam_sumfs.F90

Matthieu

--
================================================================
Dr. Matthieu Verstraete mailto:mjv500@york.ac.uk
Dept. of Physics, University of York, tel: +44 1904 43 22 08
Heslington, YO10 5DD York, United Kingdom fax: +44 1904 43 22 14



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page