Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

forum - Re: Re: [abinit-forum] Problem about e-ph coupling in ABINIT

forum@abinit.org

Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )

List archive

Re: Re: [abinit-forum] Problem about e-ph coupling in ABINIT


Chronological Thread 
  • From: zhangtingPKU <zhangting@pku.edu.cn>
  • To: "forum@abinit.org" <forum@abinit.org>
  • Subject: Re: Re: [abinit-forum] Problem about e-ph coupling in ABINIT
  • Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 13:41:21 +0800

Matthieu Verstraete,您好!

Thanks! Your suggestion is quite useful

======= 2006-05-22 10:33:00 您在来信中写道:=======

>> In PRB 53,R7575, the scatting matrix element of e-ph Hamiltonian
>> seems have no relation to the phonon amplitude? In the article,
>> equation (1), the Hamiltonian in the middle is just the phonon
>> polarization vector times the gradient of the self-consistent potential.
>> This is quite different compared with the equations in Mahan's "Many
>> particle Physics".
>the perturbed hamiltonian should be dotted into the phonon displacement
>vector. The difference with the polarization vector is the 1/sqrt(M) which
>is present in eq (1). In Amy we trust!
>
>> Another question: Also in the PRB article,equation (2), there are two
>> delta function delta(Enk-Ef)*delta(En'k'-Ef). Does this mean before and
>> after scattering with phonon,the electron states should both have the
>> same energy,which equals to Ef?
>yes.
>
>> This is strange. I'm interesting in the
>> scatting of phonons and non-equilibrium "hot" electrons, If the ABINIT
>> code could only handle the e-ph coupling just at the fermi level, it
>> will be a great depression to me.
>Well... valium? Or check the publications by Mauri and Ferrari on hot
>phonons. PWSCF may be able to do something. Or you can code in abinit. It
>shouldn't be a huge change, but I haven't looked at it in detail. For the
>moment the FS is taken into account with either the tetrahedron method or
>a smearing width. With the latter you can increase the temperature and get
>a wider contribution to the FS. That's a start, but there should also be
>something about the finite T of the phonons themselves somewhere. Dunno.
>
>> The third question: dose the GKK file contain the scattering matrix
>> elements? I can't understand its format.Can someone tell me how the bulk
>> S-matrix data organised in the GKK file? Can I find a detailed
>> explaination of the format,and the meaning of date in such *.ep_* files?
>The gkk file contains the raw perturbations generated by abinit from
>phonon runs: perturbation of 1 atom in 1 reduced direction for 1 qpoint,
>for all atoms and directions but for the irreducible qpoints only. If you
>look at the input for mrggkk you can set the output to ascii text if you
>really want to look at them (huge file though). In the latest version
>(released in a few days) you'll have access to flags which let you write
>the actual gkk matrix used in the code to disk instead of keeping
>everything in memory. However these matrices contain an intermediate
>quantity used for interpolation
>
>gamma=<psi_k+q | H_q,a,idir | psi_k > <psi_k | H_q,b,jdir | psi_k+q>
>
>or the same thing dotted with the displacement vectors then rotated to the
>cartesian reference frame (q dropped, sum over everything):
>
>e^j_a',idir' d^j_a,idir gamma d^j_b,jdir e^j_b',jdir'
>
>Anyhow, this may not answer your question, but if you want the standard
>g_kk' matrices out you will have to write a few lines of code in
>src/07ddb/completeperts.F90 and src/07ddb/nmsq_gam_sumfs.F90
>
>Matthieu
>
>--
>================================================================
>Dr. Matthieu Verstraete mailto:mjv500@york.ac.uk
>Dept. of Physics, University of York, tel: +44 1904 43 22 08
>Heslington, YO10 5DD York, United Kingdom fax: +44 1904 43 22 14

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =


        致
礼!


        zhangtingPKU
        zhangting@pku.edu.cn
          2006-05-23







  • Re: Re: [abinit-forum] Problem about e-ph coupling in ABINIT, zhangtingPKU, 05/23/2006

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page