forum@abinit.org

Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )

List archive

Re: [abinit-forum] memory need

From: "Anglade Pierre-Matthieu" <anglade@gmail.com>
To: forum@abinit.org
Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] memory need
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 11:40:38 +0200
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=e5UUiyjHZorNhSDss/AuYOJnwR7nvAIEHuyv5N+yUgVl+WGIkVHt2OU0mqGJqPndlwjfHcMvTm0i6xNJbfkQv7v1W0POVohlPHrEW42zpe0AFmB9pWZvmNdvaOci5fdh6SceHZ7fb1iHYeY4rdww1eGvB2gNsYH10kStxoYdZtI=

If you have a network or something like that you can run in parallel
over the k-points. This also reduces the per process memory
requirement.

On 6/15/06, Szieberth Denes <dino@iris.inc.bme.hu> wrote:

Hi,
I'm attemptig a ground state calculation on a fairly large unit cell
but even with mkmem and mffmem set to 0 the memory need of the job is
still too large for my computer. Is there any other option to reduce the
memory need of a ground state calculation? Ecut is already at the smallest
sensible value...

cheers,

Denes

--
Pierre-Matthieu Anglade

memory need, Szieberth Denes, 06/15/2006
- Re: [abinit-forum] memory need, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 06/15/2006