Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

forum - Re: [abinit-forum] Ni surface

forum@abinit.org

Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )

List archive

Re: [abinit-forum] Ni surface


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Prasenjit Sen <prasen@hri.res.in>
  • To: forum@abinit.org
  • Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] Ni surface
  • Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 09:18:19 +0530 (IST)

Dear Abram:
A quick suggestion is try using iscf=3 instead of 5. See if that
works.

Best,
Prasenjit Sen

On Mon, 19 Jun 2006, avanderg wrote:

> Hello All,
>
> I have been trying to optimize the geometry of a three layer Ni slab
> with a vacuum slab. I have been unable to get this system to converge
> for the geometry optimization. I first ran convergence tests for the
> system before geometry optimization to get reasonable values of ecut,
> the k points and tsmear. Since I have been trying to run the geometry
> optimization I have changed many parameters but I still am having
> problems with the convergence. The error I have been seeing is:
>
> scfcge: WARNING -
> Potential-based CG line minimization has trouble to converge.
>
> and
>
> scfcge : ERROR -
> Potential-based CG line minimization not converged after 13 restarts.
> Action : read the eventual warnings about lack of convergence.
> Some might be relevant. Otherwise, raise nband.
>
> Trying to take this into account (and the FAQ) I have used up to 130
> bands for the 3 Nickel atoms (which only has 10 valence electrons each)
> which seems extremely large to me. I have also started to use
> non-defalut values of nline and nnsclo. I have also used different
> convergence parameters using both tolvrs and toldfe as well for tolmxf.
> I have also tried using the initial locations of the atoms as the
> expected final result (from literature) and using the bulk spacing. I
> have also used both the Broyden and CG values for ionmov. It basically
> comes down to the fact that I have tried many things that have been
> mentioned in past forum posts for surface calculations for transition
> state metals. These calculations also invariably take a large amount of
> computation time (days). I would really appreciate some help. Below I
> have included one of my most recent input files and I have also attached
> my output file since my log file is so large (scfcge is the only warning
> I am getting).
>
> Thank you
>
> Abram Van Der Geest
>
>
> --INPUT--------
> #I'm trying to get the ground stat of the Ni 111 surface
> #optimizing the surface
>
> #kpts
> kptopt 1
> kptrlatt 9 0 0
> 0 9 0
> 0 0 1
> shiftk 0.0 0.0 0.0
>
> #geo opt
> optcell 0
> tolmxf 1.0d-5
> ionmov 2
> ntime 15
>
> #metal
> occopt 4 #use first cold smearing option
> tsmear 0.003 # d electrons should have smaller tsmear
>
> nband 75
>
> #magnetized
> nsppol 2 #treat spin
> spinat 0.0 0.0 3.0 #break spin symmetry of atom 1
> 0.0 0.0 3.0 #break spin symmetry of atom 2
> 0.0 0.0 3.0 #break spin symmetry of atom 3
>
> #def of super cell
> acell 2*3.25564 9.796022881
> rprim 1.0 -1.0 0.0
> 0.0 1.0 -1.0
> 1.0 1.0 1.0
> ckprim 0
>
> #def of atom type
> ntypat 1 #one type of atom
> znucl 28 #and it is Ni
> natom 3 #number of atoms per supercell
> typat 3*1 #the first three atoms are nickel
>
> xred 1/3 2/3 0.78065362 #the 1st atom is at origin
> 2/3 1/3 0.0 #location of second atom
> 1.0 1.0 0.21934638 #location of atom 3
>
> #Misc
> toldfe 1.0d-5 #scf tolerance (total E)
> prtwfk 1
> getwfk -1 #get wfk from earlier run
> ixc 1 #LDA approx
> diemac 1.0d6 #preconditioner for a metal
> nstep 100 #max number of scf cycles
> ecut 25 #energy cut off for plane waves
> diemix 0.05
>
> nline 6
> nnsclo 3
>
>





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page