forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: "LEE Chin Chai" <cc-lee@imre.a-star.edu.sg>
- To: <forum@abinit.org>
- Subject: RE: [abinit-forum] FW:Problem in using flag optcell
- Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 19:52:32 +0800
Hi Matthieu,
Thank for the correction for acell. It should be in angstrom,indeed.
Yes, a and b for rprim are interchanged.
Could you give some examples to demonstrate the different between
optcell=1 and optcell=3?
ChinChai
-----Original Message-----
From: Matthieu Verstraete [mailto:mjv500@york.ac.uk]
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2006 7:11 PM
To: forum@abinit.org
Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] FW:Problem in using flag optcell
Hi,
It looks like your structure is too contorted. For one, your acell are
probably in angstroem, which you must specify explicitly (add Angstr)
The Si atoms also look compacted into planes in the CoSi part. Probably
wrong.
Further, I'm not sure (although maybe) that your rprim is correct: it
doesn't look like the atoms are in nice hexagonal packing. If your a and
b
are interchanges it may explain the last 2 points.
In short, abinit is fine, but your atomic positions are wrong somehow,
so
the relaxation algorithm explodes the structure, and the next Broyden
step
is all wrong.
Matthieu
--
================================================================
Dr. Matthieu Verstraete mailto:mjv500@york.ac.uk
Dept. of Physics, University of York, tel: +44 1904 43 22 08
Heslington, YO10 5DD York, United Kingdom fax: +44 1904 43 22 14
- RE: [abinit-forum] FW:Problem in using flag optcell, LEE Chin Chai, 10/09/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.