Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

forum - Re: [abinit-forum] Why my SCF calculation does not converge?

forum@abinit.org

Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )

List archive

Re: [abinit-forum] Why my SCF calculation does not converge?


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Anglade Pierre-Matthieu" <anglade@gmail.com>
  • To: forum@abinit.org
  • Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] Why my SCF calculation does not converge?
  • Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 14:01:59 +0200
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=cQkZLWGu6BI679EHPsOFrbEVizNjRE6dt2HPfNhUIUAtPy5QTqZxFQ4QvjE7ud+Tx11urK1OOt9hs2M482tdexeSel/+uGY75vDejvWasFm/J46lsdrk74tha7JO2jlySOrlMb24f1wjahb/dY5PoTsvbsOE4dOhhDDem5h6vX4=

Dear Konstantin

Have you tryed to optimize diemac and dielng ? On bulk materials
Kerker's preconditioner should behave almost perfectly and almost for
free...
Otherwise do you use an electronic temperature as zhangting does ? No
electronic temperature can also prevent convergency on systems with
for instance dangling bonds like a defect in an otherwise bulk Si
cell.

regards

PMA

On 10/23/06, Konstantin Rushchanskii <konstantin.rushchanskii@cea.fr> wrote:
Dear Matthieu,

I have had the same problem with bulk materials.

Regards,
Konstantin
>
> GGA can be more sensitive to vaccuum (certain terms can diverge when n
> ->0 though this should be treated properly in abinit kudos for
> Xavier), need higher ecut or other convergence parameters. Try other
> iscf values, nline variables, or just be happy with 10-10 which is not
> bad for tolvrs.
>
> Matthieu
>
>




--
Pierre-Matthieu Anglade



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page