forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: "Jin Zhang" <jin.zhang.pku@gmail.com>
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] SCF calculation from atomic relaxed coordinates
- Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 12:38:43 +0800
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ZSJoX7k/+CWh4VuYHXizAmUj/hs7oHetavFH7XrvH1R0AaGCuj8NJhcXSqOf1wH76vf7YbVM7bc8rMqbh6WluaeUwozjWN2uNEWd12CUNv1i9jZu5/vqwvc4jDVcyYsLrCz2dFC6b12tjBPGz1CneafnxmIzdhHCrJCUUCH3bXQ=
Dear chang,
Did you use different stop-criterions for scf cycle. I suspect the
difference comes from these settings:
-----
toldff 2.3d-6
# tolvrs 1.0d-6
----
BTW: maybe nstep=30 is a little small for a slab to reach convergence.
Best,
--
Jin Zhang
Dep. of Physics,
Peking University
On 11/23/06, yunhee.chang@kriss.re.kr <yunhee.chang@kriss.re.kr> wrote:
Dear Abinit users,
I'm calculating the In on Si(111) surface system.
When I calculate the total energy using the fully relaxed atomic
coordinates,
I cannot reach the same total energy and force.
I didn't use the previous WFK files,
I just do SCF cycle to get ground state
using relaxed atomic coordinates.
The relaxed force is reached about 0.001 eV/A,
but in SCF calculation using this coordinates,
the force is reaching about 0.05 eV/A.
That means electronic SCF minimization has some problem..??
I increased the nband, but it's still same.
Do I have to choose another SCF cycle?
Would you give me any comments?
This is my input file.
==============================================================================
# Si(111)-4x1: 3BL slab
# A first step of atomic relaxation and total energy
# Definition of occupation number
occopt 3
tsmear 0.0007
nband 80
#Definition of the unit cell
acell 2.105671378027334 3.647129810786902
1.488934510353547
rprim 12.000000000000000 0.000000000000000
0.000000000000000
0.000000000000000 2.000000000000000
0.000000000000000
0.000000000000000 0.000000000000000
40.000000000000000
chkprim 0 # This input variable allows to use non-primitive
unit
# cells. Please, do not use it in other cases,
# you might miss a primitive cell, faster to
handle.
#Definition of the atom types
ntypat 4 # There is only one type of atom
znucl 49 14 14 1 # The keyword "znucl" refers to the atomic number of
the
# possible type(s) of atom. The pseudopotential(s)
# mentioned in the "files" file must correspond
# to the type(s) of atom. Here, the only type is
Aluminum
#Definition of the atoms
natom 34 # There are two atoms in this doubled cell
typat 4*1 2*2 24*3 4*4 # These atoms are of type 1, that is, Aluminum
#Define the methodology to find the minimum
# ionmov 4 # Use the conjugate gradient algorithm
# ntime 30 # Maximum number of Broyden "timesteps"
# tolmxf 2.3d-5 # Stopping criterion for the geometry optimization
: when
# the residual forces are less than tolmxf, the
Broyden
# algorithm can stop
natfix 12 # Fix the position of two symmetry-equivalent atoms
# in doing the structural optimization
iatfix 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34
# Choose atoms 1 and 2 as the fixed atoms (see
discussion)
xangst # This keyword indicate that the location of the
atoms
# will follow, one triplet of number for each atom
4.81208922716606 0.00000000000000 18.96242987264197
7.06126514599433 1.92997798069774 18.44619525314767
9.54107109659771 0.00000000000000 18.50244627453926
11.79858364903775 1.92997798069774 18.89701241902430
0.93752037965351 1.92997798069774 17.98049761864093
2.32517430108428 0.00000000000000 18.02460434084392
0.06883434180141 1.92997798069774 15.70707828157864
3.24669481604957 0.00000000000000 15.78259586066670
6.69653954661645 1.92997798069774 15.76397531371200
10.00849002402831 0.00000000000000 15.82662540146863
1.09655439061929 0.00000000000000 14.82273027715486
4.42974022967583 1.92997798069774 15.06176351602779
7.80109204091853 0.00000000000000 14.94996234174407
11.13930017846617 1.92997798069774 15.05651503941083
1.10445225490822 0.00000000000000 12.50168835550348
4.45211632475764 1.92997798069774 12.65811154209729
7.79905934629338 0.00000000000000 12.59472103448601
11.14927953093290 1.92997798069774 12.65600080591594
2.24677893930407 1.92997798069774 11.79467792107055
5.56327379886284 0.00000000000000 11.83351245642332
8.92328674704478 1.92997798069774 11.82214274533964
12.23084192705557 0.00000000000000 11.81163195386842
2.22854661337181 1.92997798069774 9.45492253503307
5.57136653342950 0.00000000000000 9.45492253503307
8.91418645348719 1.92997798069774 9.45492253503307
12.25700637354488 0.00000000000000 9.45492253503307
0.00000000000000 1.92997798069774 8.66701232378028
3.34281992005769 0.00000000000000 8.66701232378028
6.68563984011538 1.92997798069774 8.66701232378028
10.02845976017307 0.00000000000000 8.66701232378028
0.00000000000000 1.92997798069774 7.20149933085016
3.34281992005769 0.00000000000000 7.20149933085016
6.68563984011538 1.92997798069774 7.20149933085016
10.02845976017307 0.00000000000000 7.20149933085016
# getwfk -1
#Definition of the k-point grids
kptopt 1 # Option for the automatic generation of k points,
ngkpt 2 8 1
nshiftk 1
shiftk 0.5 0.5 0.0
#Exchange-correlation functional
ixc 11 # GGA Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof GGA functional
#Definition of the planewave basis set
ecut 16.0 # Maximal kinetic energy cut-off, in Hartree
#Definition of the SCF procedure
nstep 30 # Maximal number of SCF cycles
toldff 2.3d-6
# tolvrs 1.0d-6
prtden 1
prtdos 1
prtgeo 1
prtwf 1
============================================================================
Best regards,
Yunhee Chang
- Re: [abinit-forum] SCF calculation from atomic relaxed coordinates, Jin Zhang, 11/23/2006
- RE: [abinit-forum] SCF calculation from atomic relaxed coordinates, Yunhee Chang, 11/23/2006
- Re: [abinit-forum] SCF calculation from atomic relaxed coordinates, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 11/23/2006
- Re: [abinit-forum] SCF calculation from atomic relaxed coordinates, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 11/23/2006
- Re: [abinit-forum] SCF calculation from atomic relaxed coordinates, Jin Zhang, 11/23/2006
- Re: [abinit-forum] SCF calculation from atomic relaxed coordinates, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 11/23/2006
- Re: [abinit-forum] SCF calculation from atomic relaxed coordinates, Jin Zhang, 11/23/2006
- Re: [abinit-forum] SCF calculation from atomic relaxed coordinates, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 11/23/2006
- Re: [abinit-forum] SCF calculation from atomic relaxed coordinates, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 11/23/2006
- RE: [abinit-forum] SCF calculation from atomic relaxed coordinates, Yunhee Chang, 11/23/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.