forum@abinit.org

Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )

List archive

Re: [abinit-forum] save memory

From: "Jin Zhang" <jin.zhang.pku@gmail.com>
To: forum@abinit.org
Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] save memory
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 19:14:28 +0800
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=OlLesDd99H57VdlkTMnf3KPxNn5GvqxK2PEoxZutnFGH5bgf1/x8Spf9uUzNPKNQnp9JQRviLe2RYXJHhBvFNEEYjwfzrysnwD+qTzoWYERM6cTkSQRkCOk8EE2Hzf3NZYIU/iyAM/yLhH7P1y8QTbfeq+O8S8gX3lQtU3w/QAs=

Both of them can be used to save in-core mem usage.

From my experience, setting them to zero won't cause significant overhead for medium systems on a infiniband cluster.

Jin Zhang

On 1/30/07, ghada ameereh <ghaddosh@yahoo.com> wrote:

Dear abinitors: which is better to use mkmem=0 or
mffmem=0 or mffmem =10 to save memory in magnetic
moment calculation (nsppol=2).
thanks
ghada

____________________________________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Music Unlimited
Access over 1 million songs.
http://music.yahoo.com/unlimited

--
Dept. of Physics, Peking University
Beijing, P.R.China
Phone: 86-10-62753190

save memory, ghada ameereh, 01/30/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] save memory, Jin Zhang, 01/30/2007