Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

forum - Re: [abinit-forum] Convergence checking on tsmear + tphysel

forum@abinit.org

Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )

List archive

Re: [abinit-forum] Convergence checking on tsmear + tphysel


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Nicola Marzari <marzari@mit.edu>
  • To: forum@abinit.org
  • Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] Convergence checking on tsmear + tphysel
  • Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 14:33:04 -0400
  • Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology

jzwanzig@dal.ca wrote:
Dear Colleagues,
even having read the paper by Verstraete and Gonze I'm a little unclear on
the interplay between tsmear, tphysel, and occopt. For example, with occopt =
7 and tphysel = 300 K, should the energy be variational in tsmear? That is,
am I to expect monotonic behavior in the energy with increasing (or
decreasing) tsmear? I kind of hope not as I don't get that, at least for bulk
zinc. Is the idea to increase both the kpt mesh and repeatedly vary tsmear,
looking for stability (as opposed to a minimum or a maximum)? thanks for your
help,

Joe Zwanziger



Dear Joe,


for a tsmear corresponding to fermi-dirac, or gaussian, and a
tphysel set to 0, the total free energy (not sure how abinit calls
it) is quadratic in tsmear (and with a negative coefficient),
*provided you have an infinite mesh of k-points*.

If the smearing is methfessel-paxton, or marzari-vanderbilt,
the free energy will be quartic or cubic, respectively.

Most importantly, if the mesh of k-points is not infinite, the
free energy calculated at small tmsear will have a large statistical
sampling error (going either way, up or down), while the free energy
calculated at large tmsear will have a small sampling error.

If tphysel is different from 0 - I don't know
(haven't look at the Verstraete/Gonze in a long time) but I would
suspect the same identical comments would apply
(but note that 300K is really almost zero, in practice).

Another source of information is Chap 4 of
http://quasiamore.mit.edu/phd ; it is fairly complete, but does not
address the Verstraete and Gonze developments (it was written in '96).

nicola


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Prof Nicola Marzari Department of Materials Science and Engineering
13-5066 MIT 77 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge MA 02139-4307 USA
tel 617.4522758 fax 2586534 marzari@mit.edu http://quasiamore.mit.edu



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page