Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

forum - Re: [abinit-forum] Makefile for Atompaw

forum@abinit.org

Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )

List archive

Re: [abinit-forum] Makefile for Atompaw


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Anglade Pierre-Matthieu" <anglade@gmail.com>
  • To: forum@abinit.org
  • Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] Makefile for Atompaw
  • Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 17:45:32 +0200
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=aZeL9YwJLRaz9w9fpicOUCHf3mQXS+EFPMEl21hB4dNV4X9ExJRS5QV/0/G6P0vJJp66k6qUMXgexhdzrIx2MyfOPrko0y0XF78BHeRXL3HK7cqavs173QuSBXqVRmfpbkuR8FuHQdSmqAjK7K1mJFlKLH0MgEvNEFAspGdTa9I=

Hi,

Have you compiled your BLAS and LAPACK with the exact same compiler
you are using for atompaw ?

I ask this because :
1) do_fio, s_cat , ... looks like internal functions of fortran lib.
2) those functions appear nowhere in the code of blas, lapack and atompaw.
3) fortran compilers usualy links with their internal fortran lib. But
they frequently do it dynamically making difficult to link a library
(even a static one) with a program when using a different compiler.

My next question is for Pascal Rausch:
Are you sure your blas and lapack are compiled OK ? Because the error
message you get about Xerbla is pretty strange. Xerbla is defined only
once in lapack. It should obviously not be defined again in DORMBR.
This may be the sign of a compilation problem. Have you checked your
lib ?

regards

PMA



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page