forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: "Zhang, Waigen" <wg.zhang@okstate.edu>
- To: <forum@abinit.org>
- Subject: RE: [abinit-forum] LDA and GGA
- Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 23:25:26 -0500
Hi Masayoshi,
Thank you for your suggestion.
Following is the input files for LDA.Basically there is no much difference
between LDA and GGA input files,except that in GGA,ixc=11 and pseudopotential
is chosen to GGA Fritz-Haber-Institute (FHI) pseudopotential.
The Total energy I get from these two calculations are E(LDA)=-174 har
while E(GGA)=-166 har.Which one seems to make sense?
Any suggestion is welcome.
strtarget 6*0.00000
acell 10.505742641 9.669538893 12.890576834
rprim 1.00000 0.00000 0.00000
0.00000 1.00000 0.00000
-0.68199836 0.00000 0.731353702
ecut 30
ntypat 2
znucl 7 8
natom 12
typat 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
xred 1.4226786562E-01 2.5000000000E-01 7.3278448421E-02
..........
kptopt 1
ngkpt 12 12 12
nshiftk 1
shiftk 0.0 0.0 0.5
#ixc 11
nstep 100
diemac 12.0
toldfe 1.0d-6
-----Original Message-----
From: Masayoshi Mikami [mailto:mmikami@rc.m-kagaku.co.jp]
Sent: Mon 4/16/2007 8:09 PM
To: forum@abinit.org
Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] LDA and GGA
Dear Waigen Zhang,
Would you mind if we would ask you to attach your input files
(LDA v.s. GGA) in your e-mail ? Kindly notice our Netiquette:
http://www.abinit.org/community/?text=netiquette
Regards,
Masayoshi
On 2007/04/17, at 4:39, Zhang, Waigen wrote:
> The energies are actually negative.Sorry about this.
>
> Zhang,Waigen
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anglade Pierre-Matthieu [mailto:anglade@gmail.com]
> Sent: Mon 4/16/2007 2:29 PM
> To: forum@abinit.org
> Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] LDA and GGA
>
> Hi,
> I don't think this make any sense.
> Yet those are both Highly positive energy. Your structure is likely
> very unstable.
> regards
> PMA
>
> On 4/16/07, Zhang, Waigen <wg.zhang@okstate.edu> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Dear Abiniter,
>> My calculation with LDA and GGA end up with big difference in
>> Total Energy.
>> In LDA,Etotal=174 har,while in GGA it's 166 har. Dose that make
>> any sense?
>> By the way,all the other variables(such as ecut,ngkpt...) are the
>> same in
>> LDA
>> and GGA calculation.
>>
>> Best,
>> Zhang,Waigen
>
>
> --
> Pierre-Matthieu Anglade
>
> <winmail.dat>
<<winmail.dat>>
- LDA and GGA, Zhang, Waigen, 04/16/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] LDA and GGA, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 04/16/2007
- RE: [abinit-forum] LDA and GGA, Zhang, Waigen, 04/16/2007
- Message not available
- Re: [abinit-forum] LDA and GGA, Masayoshi Mikami, 04/17/2007
- RE: [abinit-forum] LDA and GGA, Zhang, Waigen, 04/17/2007
- Message not available
- Re: [abinit-forum] LDA and GGA, Masayoshi Mikami, 04/17/2007
- Message not available
- RE: [abinit-forum] LDA and GGA, Zhang, Waigen, 04/17/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] LDA and GGA, Masayoshi Mikami, 04/17/2007
- Message not available
- RE: [abinit-forum] LDA and GGA, Zhang, Waigen, 04/16/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] LDA and GGA, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 04/16/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.