forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: ha sa <ha_sadi@yahoo.com>
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] What's the thumb of rule for setting the *nband*?
- Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 03:40:22 -0700 (PDT)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=KfvVTnVzMYjYluQK3fa/7YsPjATrzS/vGiFB7wrJyIdGLo8br/QABgbY0DMkKMZm2htKM9gdxH/jPzN5moenzgqROdcxJ9fZYxavXA9eGgmZQhjcQJ7eAxMtvGjAaXjASVu+mEgIsxG03jMwByibxoFkhzkV7fHfMhBFdc2O7dE=;
Hi,
I read the emails between you and Hongyi Zhao, and have a question about it. In the tutorial ouput files (e.g. t46.out, sequential version 4.6.2) occupation numbers at different kpoints sometimes a little bit exceeds 2 like 2.11 or 2.004...etc. and the occupation of the last band is not exactly zero, but less than one 0.6, 0.0043,...etc. does that mean there isn't enough bands or what?
Regards
Hanan
Anglade Pierre-Matthieu <anglade@gmail.com> wrote:
Anglade Pierre-Matthieu <anglade@gmail.com> wrote:
Sorry,
I see that you may not know how to know that the number of band is correct:
Basically if there is too few, Abinit will warn you.
You will also be able to check by your own eyes:
Abinit writes the occupations numbers of the different bands at each
k-points. If the last band included in the computation at any k-point
is occupied (non zero occupation number) you need to increase the
number of bands.
Note that too much bands are harmless. They will just increase you
calculation time.
regards,
PMA
On 4/15/07, Anglade Pierre-Matthieuwrote:
> Hi,
> Setting the number of bands is usualy very easy.
> Basically you need one band per "independent" electrons plus a few empty bands.
> If your system is insulating you can use a very small amount of empty
> bands. For metals with d electron you usualy need many more.
> Basically for most system you can use
> nband = nelectron / 2 + nion / 2 + 2
> or for spin polarized computations
> nband = nelectron + nion + 2
> If during calculations you see that you don't have enough bands you
> can increase nband.
> If you see that you have too much of them you can decrease nband.
> Just try.
>
> regards,
> PMA
>
> On 4/15/07, Hongyi Zhaowrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I'm bewilder by the setting of the *nband*, I mean, when I
> > perform a specific computation for my model, how can I know the number
> > I used for *nband* is suitable for my computation?
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> > ---
> > Hongyi Zhao
> > GnuPG DSA: 0xD108493B
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Pierre-Matthieu Anglade
>
--
Pierre-Matthieu Anglade
Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell?
Check out new cars at Yahoo! Autos.
- What's the thumb of rule for setting the *nband*?, Hongyi Zhao, 04/15/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] What's the thumb of rule for setting the *nband*?, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 04/15/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] What's the thumb of rule for setting the *nband*?, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 04/15/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] What's the thumb of rule for setting the *nband*?, ha sa, 04/18/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] What's the thumb of rule for setting the *nband*?, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 04/18/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] What's the thumb of rule for setting the *nband*?, Paul Fons, 04/19/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] What's the thumb of rule for setting the *nband*?, Xavier Gonze, 04/19/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] What's the thumb of rule for setting the *nband*?, Paul Fons, 04/19/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] What's the thumb of rule for setting the *nband*?, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 04/18/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] What's the thumb of rule for setting the *nband*?, ha sa, 04/18/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] What's the thumb of rule for setting the *nband*?, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 04/15/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] What's the thumb of rule for setting the *nband*?, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 04/15/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.