Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

forum - Re: Questions on the definition of the k-point grids for the slab mode in the surface's computations.

forum@abinit.org

Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )

List archive

Re: Questions on the definition of the k-point grids for the slab mode in the surface's computations.


Chronological Thread 
  • From: paul.boulanger@umontreal.ca
  • To: forum@abinit.org
  • Subject: Re: Questions on the definition of the k-point grids for the slab mode in the surface's computations.
  • Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 09:43:03 +0200

Hi again,

If you inspect carefully the tutorial, you will find that in t44.in you are
not calculating the properties of the Al slab, but of the Al bulk crystal.
This step is included only to check that the double cell is well defined: the
total energy is only the double of the energy of the primitive cell. Since we
are doing a bulk crystal we use a three-dimensional K point mesh:

ngkpt 4 4 4

In t45.in, we proceed to include vacuum in our double cell to create the
slab. Hence, one dimension is stretch in real space: the corresponding
dimension is shrinked in reciporcal space. Since that dimension is so tiny,
one point is enough to sample it. Are K-point grid because:

ngkpt 4 4 1

The change in the K-point mesh shifts comes from the fact that in t44.in we
want to compare the primitive cell and the double cell. To do this, we must
make sure the K point sampling error is the same between the two
calculations. We use a trick to generate a K point mesh with the same error.
But, using a standard mesh would be fine for computing properties.

Paul



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page