Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

forum - Re: Re: [abinit-forum] Re: Questions on the definition of the k-point grids for the slab mode in the surface's computations.

forum@abinit.org

Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )

List archive

Re: Re: [abinit-forum] Re: Questions on the definition of the k-point grids for the slab mode in the surface's computations.


Chronological Thread 
  • From: paul.boulanger@umontreal.ca
  • To: forum@abinit.org
  • Subject: Re: Re: [abinit-forum] Re: Questions on the definition of the k-point grids for the slab mode in the surface's computations.
  • Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 15:15:19 +0200

>Why should we make this change?

Well I explained this in my previous post, but maybe I wasn't clear enough.
In t44.in we double the cell and we rotate it. The rotation allows one to
have one axis in the direction perpendiculare to the surface and thus enables
to include vacuum easily (by increasing it's length).

Since the unit cell changed, we must change the way we specify the K point
grid. If I remember correctly (!!!), this change is only in the way we
specify it, the grid does not change. You can draw the cell and the K points
and see it is the same for both calculations.

The reason we specify this K-point mesh shifts comes from the fact that in
t44.in we want to compare the total energy of primitive cell and the double
cell. Thus, we do not includ some errors coming from different K point
sampling.

Hope this helps,

Paul


  • Re: Re: [abinit-forum] Re: Questions on the definition of the k-point grids for the slab mode in the surface's computations., paul . boulanger, 04/20/2007

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page