forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: "Anglade Pierre-Matthieu" <anglade@gmail.com>
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] structural optimization
- Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 18:23:04 +0200
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=WeH0pZAHcgMzWeLOf8Lv4f39ikSFVxE4nlxzeNkW2S/v7MqzRJ6W7E6YBVfyjs+j15E/CBlrsm4r61f3k76TMYY2DRIN/u0f5HckM/KZQ8JqExTyIPvAHUaD/68aGbpTzosprI3KnwhrLZ/l8wGj/97o/NWRtUZwVnOV7l4AhqM=
Hello,
It's really hard to say what went wrong in your calculations. Please
follow Abinit netiquette
(http://www.abinit.org/about/?text=../Infos/netiquette). We'll get
much more accurate informations and will be able to help.
regards
PMA
On 4/29/07, Zhang, Waigen <wg.zhang@okstate.edu> wrote:
Dear all,
I am running a structural optimization with parameters from experiment.But
somehow I
can never get the same optimized structural information with experimental
ones.
I set ntime1=50 and ntime2=100 for internal coordinate and lattice
parameter optimization,
which are really time comsuming but still seem not enough.Besides,the
experimental
parameters are under pressure,say 10Gpa.So I set
strtarget=3*10Gpa,3*0.000.But I always
get the sigma(3,1) not equal to zero and
sigma(1,1),sigma(2,2),sigma(3,3) are quite
away from the supposed one.
Should I consider that the experimental parameters are not correct or
should I set
ntime to some bigger numbers(which is really wasting my life)?
Zhang,Waigen
--
Pierre-Matthieu Anglade
- structural optimization, Zhang, Waigen, 04/29/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] structural optimization, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 04/29/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.