Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

forum - Re: [abinit-forum] Re: Is Abinit's gw method able to calculate the II-VI semiconductors including cationic semicore d states?

forum@abinit.org

Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )

List archive

Re: [abinit-forum] Re: Is Abinit's gw method able to calculate the II-VI semiconductors including cationic semicore d states?


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Xavier Gonze <gonze@pcpm.ucl.ac.be>
  • To: forum@abinit.org
  • Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] Re: Is Abinit's gw method able to calculate the II-VI semiconductors including cationic semicore d states?
  • Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 09:20:57 +0200

Dear Huanggy04,

If there is no ZnO GW calculation until now ... you will be the first !

More seriously, there aren't many GW softwares, there are even less
GW softwares able to do ZnO, and there are even less GW softwares publicly available
able to do ZnO. And the GW experts have many things to do ...

On 30 Apr 2007, at 04:57, huanggy04@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn wrote:

Thanks.
I have noticed these papers except "a paper of the group of Steven Louie on ZnS and ZnSe, PRB 66 195215 (2002)",which used plane wave method.Because I focus on the ZnO and I found no papers was a straightforward application of plane wave GWA to ZnO including cationic semicore d states(3s,3p,3d,4s),I may make a mistake.I wonder why it seams there is not any plane wave GWA to ZnO including d states,furthermore it seams there is not any calculations to wurtzite ZnO including d states.

I notice that your method is a model GWA,and the result is excellent. Is it included by Abinit? Sorry,I am still not very familiar with Abinit at present.


In ABINIT, GW calculation are not model GWA. You can use different approximations for the frequency integration
(4 plasmon-pole models) or perform it on the imaginary axis, you can perform one-shot (perturbative) calculations,
or include self-consistency at different levels.

You should read the information about the input variables contained in
http://www.abinit.org/Infos_v5.3/input_variables/vargw.html
especially gwcalctyp and ppmodel . You should also follow the tutorials,
if you have not yet done so.

So, apart the pseudopotential generation, a GW computation of ZnO should be rather
straightforward, although correct results might only be obtained with a rather
time-consuming self-consistent
GW calculation with numerical integration (gwcalctyp 29).

Xavier



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page