forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: paul.boulanger@umontreal.ca
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: Re: amorphous SiO2
- Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 11:21:09 +0200
Hi,
I never did amorphous systems with Abinit, but I think their are a few stange
things in your input file. First, you seem to increase your acell by 5 bohrs
in every direction at each dataset. Couple this with the fact that you use
reduced coordinates for your atoms and you get that you increase the bond
length between your atoms at every dataset. Are you sure this is what you
want?? By the fourth dataset, you have tripled the bond length of your atoms:
the Si-O bond length is 9.456 bohrs is your last dataset.
Secondly, you are using getwk -1 which states that you use the wavefunctions
of the previous datasets as input. I am not sure this is desirable, because
the atomic positions vary greatly. Hence, your input wavefunctions are not a
good approximation for the new wavefunctions.
Thirdly, you define ecut? 14 without any increments. I think the code will
only ignore the extra character (?) and define ecut 14 for every dataset. But
is this want you wanted? Furthermore, your ecut seems a little low for
oxygen, maybe increasing it will yield a better relaxation.
Well, that all I can think of. I nver simulated amorphous systems and hence I
don't really know the tricks used to generate such systems in a periodic
code. But it seems to me that your are currently doing a crystalline
calculation with different cell parameters.
Hope this helps a little,
Paul
- amorphous SiO2, fet, 05/02/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] amorphous SiO2, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 05/02/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] amorphous SiO2, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 05/02/2007
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: amorphous SiO2, paul . boulanger, 05/02/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] amorphous SiO2, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 05/02/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.