Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

forum - Re: [abinit-forum] Wurtzite phonon disp./ discontinuity in Gamma-A direction

forum@abinit.org

Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )

List archive

Re: [abinit-forum] Wurtzite phonon disp./ discontinuity in Gamma-A direction


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Xavier Gonze <gonze@pcpm.ucl.ac.be>
  • To: Marcel Mohr <marcel@physik.tu-berlin.de>
  • Cc: Forum abinit <forum@abinit.org>
  • Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] Wurtzite phonon disp./ discontinuity in Gamma-A direction
  • Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 21:29:23 +0200

Dear Marcel,

As indicated by Resul, Aldo and Mathieu, the limiting behaviour of the
phonon branches for q->0 DOES depend on the direction ! 

For polar materials (for which there is a LO-TO splitting), 
only in simple cubic structures like zinc-blende (e.g. GaAs),
you will find that the limiting value is the same irrespective of the direction.

For wurtzite or other tetragonal or trigonal (or less symmetrical structure),
the behaviour depends on the direction. The TO frequency will not be affected
by the direction, but the LO frequency will depend on the direction. 

As an example, see the quartz phonon band structure in

Interatomic force constants from first-principles : the case of a-quartz.

X. Gonze, J.-C. Charlier, D.C. Allan and M.P. Teter. Phys. Rev. B (Rapid Communication) 50, 13035-13038 (1994).

For the underlying theory, see the section VIII.  B , especially equation 62, of

Dynamical matrices, Born effective charges, dielectric permittivity tensors, and interatomic force constants from density-functional perturbation theory.

X. Gonze and C. Lee. Phys. Rev. B 55, 10355-10368  (1997). 


Best wishes,
Xavier

On 07 May 2007, at 18:55, Marcel Mohr wrote:

Dear Resul, Aldo and Mathieu

thank you for your replies. I checked the output. For dataset 3 (i.e. the el field ) calculation I obtain different energies at the different directions (in plane/perp plane).

  Phonon wavevector (reduced coordinates) :  0.00000  0.00000  0.00000
 Phonon frequencies in cm-1    :
-  4.111561E+00  4.113461E+00  1.151039E+01  3.257683E+01  3.257684E+01
-  1.241432E+02  1.744005E+02  1.780705E+02  1.780705E+02  1.810052E+02
-  1.810053E+02  1.930965E+02

  Phonon at Gamma, with non-analyticity in the
  direction (cartesian coordinates)  1.00000  0.00000  0.00000
 Phonon frequencies in cm-1    :
-  4.112028E+00  4.194273E+00  1.151039E+01  3.257683E+01  3.257684E+01
-  1.241432E+02  1.744005E+02  1.780705E+02  1.810052E+02  1.810053E+02
-  1.930965E+02  2.047706E+02

  Phonon at Gamma, with non-analyticity in the
  direction (cartesian coordinates)  0.00000  1.00000  0.00000
 Phonon frequencies in cm-1    :
-  4.112977E+00  4.193344E+00  1.151039E+01  3.257683E+01  3.257684E+01
-  1.241432E+02  1.744005E+02  1.780705E+02  1.810052E+02  1.810053E+02
-  1.930965E+02  2.047706E+02

  Phonon at Gamma, with non-analyticity in the
  direction (cartesian coordinates)  0.00000  0.00000  1.00000
 Phonon frequencies in cm-1    :
-  4.111561E+00  4.113461E+00  1.163689E+01  3.257683E+01  3.257684E+01
-  1.241432E+02  1.780705E+02  1.780705E+02  1.810052E+02  1.810053E+02
-  1.930965E+02  2.089019E+02

I guess they should all be equal, independent of direction?

Cheers Marcel

On Mon, 7 May 2007, Aldo Humberto Romero wrote:

I agree with Mathieau.. did you check if your frequencies
from the anaddb analysis in Gamma match the values obtained
from the electric field perturbation?.. I am sure they will not and
you will have to use the ones obtained from the electric field
perturbation calculation.

-aldo.

Dear Aldo, dear Mathieau

was the data for the Gamma point obtained from anaddb ? or the
frequencies were obtained in a different calculation with polarization.
Yes, from anadbb, and corrected (as in tutorial)
All frequencies were obtained in 1 calculation run.

Maybe I should use `rfelfd3 = 1` ?


I posted anadbb input and (some) abinit input below.

Did you use the anaddb keyword to symmetrize the ifc's?..
If you mean the parameter 'symdynmat' , I didn't specify it and used v.
5.2.3, so I guess it was 0. (at least that's what the online manual says).

Will it help to switch it on?

Cheers Marcel



Attachment:
==========

!!!Anaddb input file

!Input file for the ifc code. Analysis of the AlAs DDB

!Flags
  ifcflag   1     ! Interatomic force constant flag

!Wavevector grid number 1 (coarse grid, from DDB)
   brav    4      ! Bravais Lattice : 1-S.C., 2-F.C., 3-B.C., 4-Hex.)
   ngqpt   6  6  4   ! Monkhorst-Pack indices
   nqshft  1         ! number of q-points in repeated basic q-cell
   q1shft  0.0 0.0 0.0

!Effective charges
      asr   1     ! Acoustic Sum Rule. 1 => imposed asymetrically
   chneut   1     ! Charge neutrality requirement for effective charges.

!Interatomic force constant info
   dipdip  1      ! Dipole-dipole interaction treatment
   ifcana  1      ! Analysis of the IFCs
   ifcout 50      ! Number of IFC's written in the output, per atom
   natifc  4      ! Number of atoms in the cell for which ifc's are
analysed
    atifc  1 2 3 4     ! List of atoms



###abinit input file


    ndtset   24
#Set 1 : ground state self-consistency

   getwfk1   0            # Cancel default
   kptopt1   1            # Automatic generation of k points, taking
                          # into account the symmetry
     nqpt1   0            # Cancel default
   tolvrs1   1.0d-18      # SCF stopping criterion (modify default)
   rfphon1   0            # Cancel default

#Q vectors for all datasets

#Complete set of symmetry-inequivalent qpt chosen to be commensurate
# with kpt mesh so that only one set of GS wave functions is needed.
#Generated automatically by running GS calculation with kptopt=1,
# nshift=0, shiftk=0 0 0 (to include gamma) and taking output kpt set
# file as qpt set. Set nstep=1 so only one iteration runs.

      nqpt   1            # One qpt for each dataset (only 0 or 1 allowed)
                          # This is the default for all datasets and must
                          #  be explicitly turned off for dataset 1.
snipped 24 q-points<

#Set 2 : Response function calculation of d/dk wave function

     iscf2   -3         # Need this non-self-consistent option for d/dk
   kptopt2   2          # Modify default to use time-reversal symmetry
   rfphon2   0          # Cancel default
   rfelfd2   2          # Calculate d/dk wave function only
   tolvrs2   0.0        # Cancel default for d/dk
   tolwfr2   1.0d-22    # Use wave function residual criterion instead

#Set 3 : Response function calculation of Q=0 phonons and electric field
pert.

   getddk3   2          # d/dk wave functions from last dataset
   kptopt3   2          # Modify default to use time-reversal symmetry
   rfelfd3   3          # Electric-field perturbation response only

#Sets 4-10 : Finite-wave-vector phonon calculations (defaults for all
datasets)

    getwfk   1          # Use GS wave functions from dataset1
    kptopt   3          # Need full k-point set for finite-Q response
    rfphon   1          # Do phonon response
   rfatpol   1 4        # Treat displacements of all atoms
     rfdir   1 1 1      # Do all directions (symmetry will be used)
    tolvrs   1.0d-8     # This default is active for sets 3-10

snipped the rest<




-- 
Dr. Aldo Humberto Romero
FULL PROFESSOR CINVESTAV - Unidad Queretaro
Libramiento Norponiente 2000
Real de Juriquilla, CP 76230, Qro, Queretaro
Mexico

Phone: + 52 442 441 4909
Fax: + 52 442 441 4938
WWW:  qro.cinvestav.mx/~aromero







Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page