forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: Masayoshi Mikami <mmikami@rc.m-kagaku.co.jp>
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] v.5.3.x is slower than v.5.2.x ?!
- Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 21:51:01 +0900
Dear Marc,
Thank you for the quick comment !
I attach the config.log ... then I noticed...
abinit-5.2.3/config.log:FCFLAGS_OPT='-O3 -tpp1'
abinit-5.2.4/config.log:FCFLAGS_OPT='-O2'
abinit-5.3.0/config.log:FCFLAGS_OPT='-O2'
abinit-5.3.2/config.log:FCFLAGS_OPT='-O2'
abinit-5.3.3/config.log:FCFLAGS_OPT='-O2'
abinit-5.3.4/config.log:FCFLAGS_OPT='-O2'
Oh, yikes !
So, the difference between v.5.2.3 and v.5.2.4
can be due to the difference between "-O3" and "-O2".
Before the test, I will first have to check about
the effect of "-O3" (with "-tpp2" for Itanium2)
for all the versions. (Thanks for letting me notice,
and Sorry for overlooking this, please forgive me !)
Still, I will have to carefully check the gap
between v.5.3.0 and v.5.3.2; from my previous e-mail,
> v.5.2.3:- Total wall clock time (s,m,h): 5824.1 97.07 1.618
> v.5.2.4:- Total wall clock time (s,m,h): 12559.0 209.32 3.489
> v.5.3.0:- Total wall clock time (s,m,h) 13056.1 217.60 3.627
> v.5.3.2:- Total wall clock time (s,m,h) 74086.2 1234.77 20.580
> v.5.3.3:- Total wall clock time (s,m,h): 74144.5 1235.74 20.596
> v.5.3.4:- Total wall clock time (s,m,h): 74040.8 1234.01 20.567
Between the v.5.3.0 and v.5.3.2, the optimization levels seem the same...
In any case, I attach all the config.log, as tar.gz.
Bien a vous,
Masayoshi
Attachment:
config.tar.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
On 2007/05/11, at 21:14, Marc Torrent wrote:
Dear Masayoshi,
> Taking the diff between the original v.5.2.4 and
> "the v.5.2.3 src with the v.5.2.4 configuration"
> (snip)
> < - Total cpu time (s,m,h): 12559.0 209.32 3.489
> < - Total wall clock time (s,m,h): 12559.0 209.32 3.489
> ---
> > - Total cpu time (s,m,h): 18226.4 303.77 5.063
> > - Total wall clock time (s,m,h): 18226.4 303.77 5.063
In order for you to be complete, could you run the "inverse", ie "v. 5.2.4 src with the v.5.2.3 configuration" ?
And now, if your
In any case, apparently the source does not seem the problem...
sentence is exact, Yann should have a look on your problem; he probably will need your config.log file, I guess...
Marc
- Re: [abinit-forum] v.5.3.x is slower than v.5.2.x ?!, Masayoshi Mikami, 05/07/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] v.5.3.x is slower than v.5.2.x ?!, Marc Torrent, 05/09/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] v.5.3.x is slower than v.5.2.x ?!, Yann Pouillon, 05/09/2007
- Message not available
- Re: [abinit-forum] v.5.3.x is slower than v.5.2.x ?!, Masayoshi Mikami, 05/11/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] v.5.3.x is slower than v.5.2.x ?!, Marc Torrent, 05/11/2007
- Message not available
- Re: [abinit-forum] v.5.3.x is slower than v.5.2.x ?!, Masayoshi Mikami, 05/11/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] v.5.3.x is slower than v.5.2.x ?!, Yann Pouillon, 05/11/2007
- (Solved) Re: [abinit-forum] v.5.3.x is slower than v.5.2.x ?!, Masayoshi Mikami, 05/14/2007
- Re: (Solved) Re: [abinit-forum] v.5.3.x is slower than v.5.2.x ?!, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 05/15/2007
- configuration to mix -O2/-O3 for different routines, Masayoshi Mikami, 05/16/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] configuration to mix -O2/-O3 for different routines, Masayoshi Mikami, 05/16/2007
- Re: (Solved) Re: [abinit-forum] v.5.3.x is slower than v.5.2.x ?!, Gilles Zerah, 05/16/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] v.5.3.x is slower than v.5.2.x ?!, Masayoshi Mikami, 05/11/2007
- Message not available
- Re: [abinit-forum] v.5.3.x is slower than v.5.2.x ?!, Marc Torrent, 05/11/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] v.5.3.x is slower than v.5.2.x ?!, Masayoshi Mikami, 05/11/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] v.5.3.x is slower than v.5.2.x ?!, Marc Torrent, 05/09/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.