forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: Pawel Scharoch <Pawel.Scharoch@pwr.wroc.pl>
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: Re: [abinit-forum] problem for ecut
- Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2007 20:48:03 +0200
- Priority: normal
Dear Pierre-Matthieu,
I would be very interested in any didactical material concerning
DFT-PW, and I would be obliged if you could send me some,
with best regards,
Pawel
----- Oryginalna wiadomość -----
Od: Anglade Pierre-Matthieu <anglade@gmail.com>
Data: Piątek, Sierpień 3, 2007 8:57 am
Temat: Re: [abinit-forum] problem for ecut
Do: forum@abinit.org
> Hi
>
> There is no such "true" ecut:
> the cutoff energy describes how many plane waves wil be used to
> describe the wave functions within your calculations. The more plane
> waves the more frequencies will be depicted and then the more accurate
> will be your calculation.
> You have to find an equilibrium between the computation time and the
> accuracy of your calculation. That's why we usually search the minimum
> ecut that accurately describe the system. Here "accurately" may
> strongly depends on the properties you want to examine. If you
> have no
> special requirement an absolute convergence of about 1e-3 Ha is
> usually considered correct because pseudopotentials tends to reproduce
> the full electron calculation on which they are based to this
> precision. That is, you will (almost) never get more physics by having
> something better converged. However some problems may require
> convergency of ecut down to 1e-4 or 1e-5 Ha.
>
> You can find examples of how to find the correct value of ecut in the
> Abinit tutorials. HAve you tryed them and reproduce the steps depicted
> there in your calculations ? If you want some comments on your own
> results, please send some details about your input and output.
>
> Also, I'm just back from a summer school where I have presented
> Abinit to very beginners in DFT - PW calculations. Then, I have lots
> of didactical materials where I insist on this very problem. If you
> like I can send those PDF to you.
>
> regards
>
> pierre-matthieu Anglade
>
> On 8/2/07, m_mousavi1980@yahoo.com <m_mousavi1980@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > I have a question
> > How can i understand which ecut for zno is true.
> > I get ecut 62.01
> > thanks
> > best regard
> >
>
>
> --
> Pierre-Matthieu Anglade
>
>
begin:vcard n:Scharoch;Pawel fn:Pawel Scharoch tel;work:713202330 url:www.if.pwr.wroc.pl/~scharoch org:Wroclaw University of Technology;Institute of Physics adr:;;Wyb. Wyspianskiego 27;Wroclaw;;50-370;Poland version:2.1 email;internet:Pawel.Scharoch@pwr.wroc.pl title:dr end:vcard
- problem for ecut, m_mousavi1980, 08/02/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] problem for ecut, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 08/03/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] problem for ecut, asubedi, 08/03/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] problem for ecut, Scott Beckman, 08/03/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] problem for ecut, Pawel Scharoch, 08/03/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] problem for ecut, hosein asadi, 08/08/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] ecut problem, farah marsusi, 08/12/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] ecut problem, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 08/12/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] ecut problem, farah marsusi, 08/13/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] ecut problem, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 08/13/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] ecut problem, farah marsusi, 08/13/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] ecut problem, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 08/12/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] problem for ecut, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 08/03/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.