forum@abinit.org
Subject: The ABINIT Users Mailing List ( CLOSED )
List archive
- From: brsahu@physics.utexas.edu
- To: forum@abinit.org
- Subject: could not find required hexagonal symmetry
- Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 01:58:27 +0200
Dear Abiniters,
I am testing the ground state calculation of a bulk mono-layer graphene (2-D)
with vacuum along z-direction (a supercell). In the input file, I have,
#Definition of the unit cell
acell 2*4.648728 5.0 # This is equivalent to 4.648728 4.648728 5.0
rprim 1.0 0.0 0.0 # Hexagonal supercell(to be scaled by acell)
0.5 0.8660254000 0.0
0.0 0.0 1.0
where a=b=4.648728 bohrs and c=5 bohrs (vacuum)
other unit-cell information are
#Definition of the atom types
ntypat 1 # There is only one type of atom
znucl 6 # The keyword "znucl" refers to the atomic number of the
# possible type(s) of atom. The pseudopotential(s)
# mentioned in the "files" file must correspond
# to the type(s) of atom. Here, the only type is Carbon.
#Definition of the atoms
natom 2 # There are two atoms
typat 2*1 # They both are of type 1, that is, Carbon.
xred # This keyword indicate that the location of the atoms
# will follow, one triplet of number for each atom
0.0 0.0 0.00 # Triplet giving the REDUCED coordinate 1.
-0.33333333 0.66666667 0.0 # Triplet giving the REDUCED coordinate 2.
ie there are two atoms one at (0,0,0) and (-1/3,2/3,0)
in the output I do not get the hexagonal symmetry instead I get triclinic
DATASET 1 : space group P-1 (# 2); Bravais aP (primitive triclinic)
================================================================================
Values of the parameters that define the memory need for DATASET 1.
intxc = 0 ionmov = 0 iscf = 17 ixc =
2
lmnmax = 8 lnmax = 4 mband = 5 mffmem =
1
P mgfft = 18 mkmem = 101 mpssoang= 2 mpw =
270
mqgrid = 3001 natom = 2 nfft = 5832 nkpt =
802
nloalg = 4 nspden = 1 nspinor = 1 nsppol =
1
nsym = 2 n1xccc = 1 ntypat = 1 occopt =
1
PAW method is used; the additional fine FFT grid is defined by:
mgfftf= 30 nfftf = 27000
================================================================================
am I missing something in the input? What could be wrong?
Sahu
- could not find required hexagonal symmetry, brsahu, 08/07/2007
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: could not find required hexagonal symmetry, brsahu, 08/07/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] Re: could not find required hexagonal symmetry, Deyu Lu, 08/07/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] Re: could not find required hexagonal symmetry, Anglade Pierre-Matthieu, 08/07/2007
- Re: [abinit-forum] Re: could not find required hexagonal symmetry, Deyu Lu, 08/07/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.